Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-11-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Nowadays, many medical research projects are funded by private companies. In your opinion, do you think that research should be carried by private companies, individuals or government?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

nowadays, madical play a crucial role in the healthcare of people. Although private companies and individuals contribute in the medical research project, but i strongly believe that the all functions and the responsibility of the medical are conducted by the government because they priorities public and the same rule and regulations for all citizens l.

The main reason why government should leads medical project is that they priorites public health rather than financial profit. private companies generally invest their project that offers high financial returns. as a result, they pay less attention in the actual diseases that mainly affect the poorer communities. In contrast, government pay attention equally on the citizens and observe the main cause of illness and make the suitable and affordable treatment that diseases. For example, government funded research can help develop medicines and suppliment that are essesable for people defferent economic background.

furthermore, the another reason for government carried research is that is ensure transparency amd public accountability. Medical research require strict regulations beacon incorrect finding and unsafe treatment can put people health in danger. moreover goverment could ethical guidelines and better research and ensure that research meets appropriate standard. however, private companies have Focus in the commercial interest, while government institutions consider the overall welfare of society.

in conclusion, although private companies and individuals have valuable contribution in research but, i believe that government should take the leading role in medical reasearch project because if their equal prioritise of citizens and strict government support and regulations would ve the most effective approach.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you argue that government should lead medical research, and you give relevant reasons concerning public health, affordability, regulation and accountability. The contrast with private companies’ focus on financial returns helps address the question, and the example of medicines accessible to people from different economic backgrounds is relevant. However, the discussion of individuals is not developed, despite their being one of the options in the prompt, and the example remains general rather than showing a specific research outcome. The point about transparency is also asserted more than explained. To strengthen the response, compare the roles of all three possible funders and extend each main reason with a concrete example or explanation of its effects.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction states your view, two body paragraphs present reasons, and a conclusion restates your position. Connectors such as “In contrast,” “Furthermore” and “In conclusion” make the main relationships between ideas clear. However, some linking is mechanical or awkward, as in “Although … but,” and “the another reason.” Within the second body paragraph, the relationship between regulation, ethical guidelines and public accountability could be sequenced more clearly. Some references are also difficult to follow, particularly “that diseases” and “their equal prioritise.” Use fewer formulaic transitions, make pronoun references explicit, and organise each paragraph around one clearly explained reason followed by its support.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant topic vocabulary, including “financial returns,” “poorer communities,” “public accountability,” “ethical guidelines” and “commercial interest.” These choices show an attempt to discuss medical research with some precision. However, spelling and word-choice errors are frequent enough to make parts of the argument unclear, for example “madical,” “priorites,” “essesable” and “defferent.” Some combinations are also unnatural, such as “conducted by the government” for research and “attention in the actual diseases.” Aim to learn accurate forms and collocations as complete phrases, and proofread carefully. More precise wording would help distinguish funding, conducting research, regulating it and making treatments available.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including a contrast clause beginning “Although” and a reason clause beginning “The main reason why.” This gives the response some structural variety. However, errors in verb forms, agreement, articles and sentence construction recur and sometimes make meaning difficult to follow. Examples include “government should leads,” “government pay attention,” and “Medical research require”; these need subject–verb agreement and correct verb forms. The opening “Although … but” also combines two contrasting structures incorrectly, while “the all functions” shows problems with article placement. Practise building accurate sentences with one main clause and a subordinate clause, then check agreement, articles and punctuation before adding more complex structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.