Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-11-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Nowadays, many medical research projects are funded by private companies. In your opinion, do you think that research should be carried by private companies, individuals or government?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Nowaday, medical companies is increasely funded by private companies. However, there is a debate medical companies should be funded by individuals or government.

In my opinion, medical compines should be funded by government because it is more benefical to impove medical system.

Additionaly, Government should support medical organization for the help of poor people. furthermore, It also contributes in these project which are makeing for high level of diseases like, cancer, viruse and hipatitcs etc. government should provides the high machinery to hospital which are helpful for operations. additionally, it supports to people for their benfit not help for their own profit.

On the other hand, privates companies aslo support medical compaines because it is very essential for people health. Moreover privates compines have skilled professional and teams whoes have more idea about updated technologies. They are also more essential for the improvement of hospitailization.

however, individuals can also take part in it. They can collected money through chartiy communities and funded to hospital.

In conclusion, government funded medical compines for the safety of human begins. While private compines and individual also support medical compaines for the better improvements.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You give a clear preference for government funding, stating that it can improve the medical system and support poorer people, and you also acknowledge the roles of private companies and individuals. However, the response addresses the question only partially: the reasons are brief and mostly asserted rather than explained or supported with a specific example. The discussion of private companies mentions skilled professionals and updated technology, but does not compare these benefits with government funding or explain which funding model should lead. The conclusion repeats the position without adding support. The response is also below the required 250 words, so there is not enough development to fully address the task. Extend each main reason with explanation and a relevant example.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a basic overall structure: an introduction, a paragraph supporting government funding, a paragraph mentioning private companies and individuals, and a conclusion. This helps the reader identify your main position. However, progression within paragraphs is limited, and several points are listed without showing how they connect—for example, support for poor people, disease research, and hospital machinery appear in quick succession. Linking words such as “Additionally,” “Furthermore,” “On the other hand,” and “however” are used, but some are repetitive or do not clearly signal the relationship between ideas. Improve cohesion by grouping related reasons, explaining each before moving on, and using clear references to connect sentences. Check capitalization after sentence breaks as well.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant topic vocabulary, including “medical system,” “diseases,” “skilled professional,” “updated technologies,” and “profit,” so the general subject is understandable. However, the range is limited and several spelling and word-choice errors make the writing less clear, such as “compines,” “benefical,” “hipatitcs,” and “human begins.” Some phrases are also unnatural or imprecise, including “high level of diseases,” “improvement of hospitailization,” and “for their benfit.” Aim to use accurate collocations and check spelling carefully. More precise terms such as “medical research,” “public healthcare,” and “advanced equipment” would help express your ideas clearly without relying on repeated forms of “support” and “companies.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple sentences and longer structures, including “because it is more beneficial…” and a contrast introduced by “On the other hand.” However, the range is limited, and errors in sentence construction and verb forms occur frequently enough to make some sentences difficult to follow. For example, “government should provides” has incorrect subject–verb agreement, while “which are makeing” and “They can collected” use faulty verb forms. There are also problems with articles, plurals, and sentence boundaries, as in “there is a debate medical companies should be funded.” Practise building accurate sentences with one main clause and a correctly formed supporting clause, then check agreement, articles, and punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.