Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-11-12
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Nowadays, many medical research projects are funded by private companies. In your opinion, do you think that research should be carried by private companies, individuals or government?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
At present time, some people think many medical reserach projects are funded by private companies. In my opinion, that reaserch should be carried by government because when private sector invest medical research that cause patient cannot affort huge fees.
On the one hand, nowadays private industry funding lot's of medical research such as cancer, strocks and also other object. When medical reasech receved fund from private companies that time they grow up the patient bills. For exmple, last year in Bangladesh medical college are finded cancer medicine of there reserch and Japan was invested money thats why medical sector are charge huge amount. For illustrate, India received huge invest from Korea because they invented medicine from there research and they charge big amount for that.
On the second hand, my opinion if government spending money on medical research that time they cannot increase medical bills. For instance, 10 years ago Bangladesh medical college invented nemunia clue and medicine, and also government support financially therefore they charge zuro amount. So, my point of view in my country they belong 10 milllion poor familly they had not enough money for medicine if government involve all sector immediatly improve this issue. So, i think medical research project should be avoid private companies fund.
In conclusion, although private fund is nessesary but also government fund is significant. In my opinion, government should be carried medical reasearch projects because public demand low bill charge for medical sector, however, that is essential part of every human life.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 4.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
Your position is clear: you believe governments should fund medical research because private investment can lead to high treatment costs. You address both sides and give examples involving Bangladesh, India, and Japan, so the response remains relevant to the question. However, some points are not fully explained. For example, the claim that private funding raises patient bills is repeated, but the link between a company’s investment and the price of a particular medicine is not clearly demonstrated. The examples about cancer medicine and a “nemunia clue” are also difficult to interpret. Develop one or two examples more carefully, and explain how government funding can keep treatments affordable while still supporting effective research.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0
The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs presenting contrasting views, and a conclusion. Paragraphs generally have a clear central purpose, and signposts such as “On the one hand,” “On the second hand,” and “In conclusion” help readers follow the argument. However, the progression within paragraphs is sometimes mechanical, and several ideas are joined without a clear relationship. For instance, the examples about Bangladesh and India appear one after another without explaining how each supports the same point. References such as “that time” and “they” can also make it unclear who or what is meant. Use more precise links between claims and examples, and vary transitions rather than relying on formulaic phrases.
Lexical Resource: Band 4.5
You use some topic-related vocabulary, including “medical research,” “private companies,” “government,” “patient bills,” and “financially,” which helps communicate the main argument. However, spelling errors and inaccurate or unnatural word choices are frequent enough to make parts of the response difficult to understand. Examples include “reserach,” “strocks,” “nemunia clue,” and “zuro amount”; phrases such as “grow up the patient bills” and “charge big amount” are also not natural collocations. Some wording is repetitive, particularly the repeated references to “huge amount” and “medical research.” Build a reliable set of accurate terms for funding, treatment costs, and affordability, and check spelling and collocations carefully.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a reason clause beginning “because” and a contrast introduced by “although.” The overall meaning is usually recoverable, but errors in sentence structure, verb forms, agreement, and articles occur in several places. For example, “when private sector invest” needs a correctly formed subject and verb, while “Bangladesh medical college are finded” has problems with agreement and the past-tense verb form. The sentence beginning “So, my point of view” is also not a complete, well-formed construction. Practise building accurate subject–verb patterns and complete sentences first, then add subordinate clauses. More consistent control of these forms would make your argument easier to follow.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.