Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-11-14

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Nowadays, many medical research projects are funded by private companies. In your opinion, do you think that research should be carried by private companies, individuals or government?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

These days, many medical research projects are funded by private companies because they can be become more famous, while this essay will explain why I think government should spend money on medical research projects because whole world are reposibility of the government.

On the one hand, many private companies funded the science research projects because they become famous. In today's world, every people have many health problems which are essencial to eradicate and find more sutainle treatmentments. Many private comapnies have more money so they spend it on research science projects. By this way, they can also apriciated by the government and achieve rewards. Moreover, individuals cannot funded on science projects because they do not have enough money to spend. Individuals can give ideas for medical research.

On the other hand, it is reponsibility of government to spend money on research science projects to find solutions of new problems that are on increase. Government should research on it so that they can help people to detect their disease.

In conclusion, although private companies can spend money on projects, I think it is more reponsibility of government. Government can research for treatments to solve the problems.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5

You state a clear preference for government funding, and you also mention why private companies invest and what individuals might contribute. However, the response addresses the task only partially: the reasons for government responsibility are brief, and the comparison between the three possible funders is not fully developed. For example, you say government research can help people detect disease, but do not explain how public funding could lead to better or fairer outcomes than private funding. The response contains 186 words, so it is 64 words below the required minimum; the nine words copied from the prompt are excluded. This limits the space available to explain and support your position. Add specific examples and develop each main reason.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, paragraphs beginning “On the one hand” and “On the other hand,” and a conclusion. This helps the reader follow the broad contrast between private and government funding. However, progression within the paragraphs is limited, and several ideas are listed without clear explanation of how they connect. For instance, the claim that companies become famous is followed by comments about health problems, funding, appreciation, and rewards, but the relationship among these points is not always clear. The conclusion largely repeats the position rather than drawing together the reasons. Use linking phrases to show cause and result, and organise each body paragraph around one main claim supported by explanation or an example.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant topic vocabulary, including “medical research projects,” “health problems,” “treatments,” and “detect their disease,” so the subject is generally clear. However, the range is limited and several word-choice, collocation, and spelling errors make parts difficult to read, such as “research science projects,” “sutable treatmentments,” and “apriciated.” Some expressions are also vague or imprecise: “become famous” does not clearly explain the benefit companies seek, while “new problems that are on increase” is awkward. Aim for accurate, natural combinations such as “fund medical research,” “develop effective treatments,” and “public health needs.” Proofreading spelling and choosing precise terms will make your argument easier to understand.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple sentences and longer structures, including a contrast with “although” and a purpose clause with “so that.” These attempts show some range, but control is inconsistent, and errors occur frequently enough to affect clarity. Examples include “they can be become,” “every people have,” “Individuals cannot funded,” and “whole world are responsibility,” where verb forms, agreement, or sentence construction are faulty. The opening sentence also joins several ideas in a way that makes the relationship between them unclear. Practise building accurate subject–verb–object sentences first, then add subordinate clauses. Check agreement, verb forms, and articles when editing, and use full stops to separate ideas that are currently crowded together.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.