Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-11-14

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Nowadays, many medical research projects are funded by private companies. In your opinion, do you think that research should be carried by private companies, individuals or government?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Introduction

Today, a lot of medical enquiry tasks are funded by private companies has become a hotly debate issue in society. This matter is particularly significant due to it's impact on researches.While some people argue that medical resarches should be funded only by government but in my view point it should be funded by all of them.

Body Paragraph 1

Now a days, a lot of medical researches projects are funded by private companies because people thought they will get a lot of funds from the companies and have a lot to invest in their project. For example,if a person have a link with private company they will try to fil out their researches from the company to get funds.

Body Paragrapg 2

Now lets have a look at those people who think only government should have to pay the funds for the research project. They thought only goverment is responsible for their funds they will only get it from them.As we know our socirty always blame the government in every situation so in this situation they also feels that government is responsible in this.

Body Paragraph 3

In my point of view, as we expected that funds will be get from government or private companies, i think both should also have to do a small involvment in the research as they are also the part of it. For the project get a small involment from companies and from government it wil be suitable and have more research option. If these two get involved in funding,a lot of other projects will get it also.

Conclusion

In conclusion, i believe that this topic clearly supports my opinion due to the reason i gave.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5

You give a clear overall view that funding should come from both government and private companies, and you refer to the two sources raised in the task. However, the response only partially develops the question: it does not explain whether individuals should also fund research, despite naming them in the prompt, and the reasons for shared funding remain vague. For example, the claim that both parties should make a “small involvement” is not supported with a specific benefit or example. The discussion of government funding mainly reports what “those people” think rather than evaluating its merits. To strengthen the response, state your position more precisely and develop each reason with a relevant example, such as how public funding can support research that is not commercially profitable.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response has a recognisable introduction, separate body paragraphs and a conclusion, and the paragraphs broadly follow the topic’s main viewpoints. Basic signposting such as “For example,” “In my point of view” and “In conclusion” helps readers identify the stages of the response. However, progression within paragraphs is limited: several sentences repeat that companies or the government provide funds without adding a new point. References such as “they” and “this situation” are sometimes unclear, and the conclusion merely says the topic supports your opinion rather than summarising the argument. Use clearer links between claims and explanations, and make each paragraph develop one distinct reason before moving to the next.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant topic vocabulary, including “medical research,” “funds,” “private companies” and “government,” so the main subject is generally understandable. However, the range is limited and several word-choice, collocation and spelling problems make the writing less natural. Examples include “medical enquiry tasks” for research projects, “hotly debate issue,” “fill out their researches” and “small involvment.” Repetition of “funds” and “research” also restricts precision. Build a more accurate set of topic phrases and check spelling and word forms; for instance, distinguish between funding research and carrying it out, and use “research projects” rather than the uncountable “researches.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple statements and longer sentences, including a contrast introduced by “While” and a conditional sentence beginning “If these two get involved.” However, the range is limited, and attempts at longer structures are often faulty. For example, “a lot of medical enquiry tasks are funded … has become” combines incompatible subject–verb forms, while “a person have” and “they also feels” show agreement errors. Missing or incorrect articles and sentence boundaries also affect clarity, as in “For the project get a small involvement” and “from them.As we know.” Practise building accurate subject–verb patterns and punctuating complete sentences before adding more complex clauses.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.