Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-07-27

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Nowadays, many medical research projects are funded by private companies. In your opinion, do you think that research should be carried by private companies, individuals or government?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

It is undeniable that many medical research projects are funded by private organisations. In this regard it is argued that funding should be carried by government of the nation. According to me healthcare projects should be funded by government operated companies, it is discussed in the forthcoming fragments with logical reasoning.

To begin with, there are endless merits of the notion that favors government funding. Firstly, free or comparatively low cost healthcare services. When the funding is handled by government it is often seen that services can be accessed at low cost. To explain the statement, example of the European countries can be taken as the healthcare services are significantly cheaper due to government funding. As a result poor population of the nation can experience better healthcare at affordable costs.

Secondly, recruitment of highly experienced staff in government funded hospitals. To elaborate, due to strict requirement standards of government organisations staff with exceptional knowledge can be hired. In contrast to the private companies that could cut cost to increase profits. As result the quality standards of healthcare projects funded by government can be raised significantly.

However, the benefits of the other notion can not be ignored such as private funded organisations have access to latest and improved technology that will boost the healthcare standards of the nation.

To conclude, although there are several benefits of the foremost notion such as low costs, experienced staff and so on. The merits of getting funds of healthcare projects from the private organisations can not be ignored at any cost.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The response addresses the prompt by discussing government versus private funding. However, the development is limited. While you state a preference for government funding, the arguments are somewhat brief and lack depth. For instance, the point about 'European countries' is a good start but needs more specific detail to fully support your position. The conclusion introduces the benefits of private funding again, which creates a slight contradiction with your earlier stance, making your position feel less consistent. To improve, ensure each body paragraph fully explores the 'why' and 'how' of your arguments, and maintain a clear, unwavering position throughout the essay.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The essay is organized into clear paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the structure. You use basic cohesive devices like 'To begin with', 'Firstly', and 'Secondly' to signal your points. However, the transition between the body paragraphs and the conclusion is a bit abrupt. Some sentences, such as 'According to me healthcare projects should be funded by government operated companies, it is discussed in the forthcoming fragments', are slightly mechanical. To reach a higher band, try to use a wider range of linking words and ensure that the progression of ideas flows more naturally between sentences rather than relying on simple list-like transitions.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.5

You demonstrate an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, using terms like 'undeniable', 'merits', and 'exceptional knowledge'. However, there are some instances of imprecise word choice and collocation issues, such as 'funding should be carried by' (should be provided/funded by) and 'forthcoming fragments' (which is not a standard academic phrase; 'following paragraphs' would be better). The vocabulary is generally sufficient to convey your meaning, but it lacks the sophistication and precision required for higher bands. Focus on learning collocations—words that naturally go together—to improve the naturalness of your writing.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.5

The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. While you attempt complex sentences, some contain grammatical errors, such as 'As result the quality standards... can be raised' (missing 'a' before 'result') and 'private funded organisations' (should be 'privately funded'). There are also minor punctuation and article errors throughout. The errors do not generally impede communication, but they are frequent enough to prevent a higher score. To improve, focus on subject-verb agreement and the correct use of articles, and try to vary your sentence structure by using more subordinating conjunctions correctly.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.