Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.5 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-08-07

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Nowadays, many medical research projects are funded by private companies. In your opinion, do you think that research should be carried by private companies, individuals or government?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 4.5)

First of all, i am introduced about the fact of research because only few people know about the benifits of research.Nowadays , medical research are important to improve the medical facilities and discovered the new medicines. In these days, many medicial research projects are funded by private companies that are not good for econmy of any country. In my opnion , i thought that hese research should be carried by government because the government will do it on large scale with carefuly and qiuckly withb the help of many foreigh countries officialy. I believed that the government secter people are more experience than private sectors .Private companies do this type of projects for there own profits but the governments are do this for the prosperity of country.In the past covied 19 are spread throughout the world and the vaccines are discoverd by governments and private companies sales this vaccine with high profit

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 4.0

The response fails to meet the minimum word count requirement of 250 words, reaching only 152 words. This significantly impacts the development of ideas. While you state a position—that government should fund research—the arguments are underdeveloped and lack sufficient supporting evidence or examples. The response is too brief to fully address the prompt's requirement to discuss why private companies, individuals, or governments should be involved. To improve, you must expand your points with detailed explanations and concrete examples, ensuring you meet the length requirement to allow for a full exploration of the topic.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.0

The essay lacks a clear paragraph structure, appearing as a single block of text. While there is a basic attempt to sequence ideas, the lack of paragraphing makes the progression of arguments difficult to follow. Cohesive devices are either missing or used incorrectly, such as the repetitive use of 'and' to connect clauses. To improve, you should organize your essay into clear paragraphs: an introduction, two body paragraphs with distinct arguments, and a conclusion. Use a wider variety of linking words like 'furthermore', 'consequently', or 'in contrast' to improve the flow between sentences.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.0

The vocabulary is limited and repetitive, often relying on basic terms. There are frequent spelling errors, such as 'benifits', 'medicial', 'econmy', 'qiuckly', 'foreigh', 'secter', 'covied', and 'discoverd'. These errors, combined with awkward phrasing like 'i am introduced about the fact of research', hinder the clarity of your message. To reach a higher band, you need to focus on accurate spelling and expanding your vocabulary to include more precise, topic-specific terminology related to medical research and public policy.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 4.5

The response contains frequent grammatical errors that often impede communication. There are issues with subject-verb agreement (e.g., 'medical research are important'), incorrect verb tenses (e.g., 'covied 19 are spread'), and awkward sentence structures. Punctuation is also inconsistent, with missing spaces after commas and incorrect capitalization. The range of structures is very limited, consisting mostly of simple sentences. You should focus on mastering basic sentence construction, ensuring correct subject-verb agreement, and practicing the use of complex sentences to improve your grammatical accuracy and range.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.