Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-08-16
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Nowadays, many medical research projects are funded by private companies. In your opinion, do you think that research should be carried by private companies, individuals or government?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.5)
In contemporary society, it has be seen that research projects in medicine are majorly sponsored by private organizations whereas, other people feel that it is the responsibility of the government to be in charge of these projects. I am of the opinion that the government should sponsor these programs because of the delicate nature of medicine and adequate funding. These points will be explained in the following paragraph with relevant examples followed by a logical conclusion.
To begin with, the government should completely be in charge of medical research as it is an important aspect of life and any mistake or wrong decision can result in loss of countless number of lives. They should be able to monitor the whole process of medical invention to avoid any lapses. For instance, inventing a vaccine to a major communicable disease can be extremely demanding and exhausting, however, the government still ensures that all due processes are followed with no step bypassed.
Furthermore, projects in medicine are extremely expensive and will require adequate funding. This can be provided by the government through revenue generated from taxes and other utility bills, of which privates organizations might not be able to completely afford to sponsor without seeking assistance. For example, the government at every stage and level have various ways of generating income and this will ensure that the program does not lack the resources needed.
In conclusion, it has been seen that private sectors are majorly in charge of carrying out medical research projects. However, I am of the opinion that the government should be allowed to champion these programs because of the sensitive nature of medicine and proper funding which the private organizations might not be able to afford.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 7.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 6.0 |
| Overall | 6.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0
The response addresses the prompt by taking a clear position that the government should fund medical research. The ideas are relevant, focusing on safety and financial capacity. However, the development is somewhat limited. While the points about safety and funding are clear, they are not fully extended with specific, concrete examples. For instance, the mention of 'vaccine' is a good start, but it remains a general hypothetical rather than a detailed illustration. To reach a higher band, the arguments need more depth and specific evidence to support the claims made.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 7.0
The essay is logically organized with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Each paragraph has a central topic, and the progression of ideas is easy to follow. Cohesive devices such as 'To begin with', 'Furthermore', and 'In conclusion' are used effectively to link ideas. However, the referencing is occasionally mechanical, and the flow between sentences could be smoother. The structure is sufficient for the task, but it lacks the sophisticated, subtle transitions that characterize higher band scores.
Lexical Resource — Band 6.0
The vocabulary is adequate for the task, allowing the writer to express their opinion clearly. There is some attempt to use topic-specific language like 'contemporary society', 'sponsored', and 'communicable disease'. However, the range is somewhat limited, and there are some minor inaccuracies in collocation, such as 'majorly sponsored' (should be 'primarily' or 'largely') and 'government at every stage and level have' (subject-verb agreement error). To improve, the student should focus on using more precise academic vocabulary and ensuring collocations are natural.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0
The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. While the meaning is generally clear, there are frequent grammatical errors that distract the reader. Examples include 'it has be seen' (should be 'it has been seen'), 'privates organizations' (should be 'private organizations'), and 'government... have' (should be 'government... has'). These errors occur throughout the text. While the student attempts complex structures, the control over them is inconsistent. Increasing the frequency of error-free sentences is essential for a higher score.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.