Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-08-17

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Nowadays, many medical research projects are funded by private companies. In your opinion, do you think that research should be carried by private companies, individuals or government?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

in this contemporary society, it is often argued that medical experimentation projects are funded by private companies rather than by individuals or by government . in my opinion , it should be further funded by the authorities.

to begin with, medical research is carried out by professional clinical researchers to significantly improve the innovation of new treatments in market to cure certain types diseases. for instance, cancer is on of the major increasing disease in the world to overcome or to take control on it investigators has to do deep research on medicies. clinical trials have to be carried out and for those expenses there have to be funded.

however, government should has the rights to sponser the investigators for this trials it would be much better on relaying certain compaines because government can modify and mainatin a clear response and data of using of materials accordingly to pharmocopiea rules where as, when funded by private compies can not be able to give a fully expendieture on research. for instance, earlier the cipla a private company has endured into research on energy drinks which came to light after the ingriedients where use in a drink should be of high quality but the budget was low of that company due , to which the experiment has to be left in the middle of the research.

overall, the government can help the investigators by funding and taking care of all needs that are used for experimenting a new project in medical research.

in conclusion ,medical projects should be funded by the government rather than the private companies.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5

The response addresses the prompt by taking a clear position in favor of government funding. However, the development of ideas is limited. While you mention the need for clinical trials and the potential for government oversight, the arguments are somewhat repetitive and lack depth. The example regarding 'Cipla' is confusing and does not clearly illustrate why private funding is inherently inferior to government funding in a way that supports your main argument effectively. To improve, ensure that each body paragraph focuses on a distinct, well-explained reason that directly supports your thesis statement.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5

The essay is organized into paragraphs, but the logical progression is hindered by awkward phrasing and mechanical transitions. While you use cohesive devices like 'to begin with' and 'however', they are sometimes used incorrectly or lead to run-on sentences that make the flow difficult to follow. Paragraphing is present, but the internal structure of the paragraphs lacks cohesion, particularly in the second body paragraph where the transition between the government's role and the private company example is abrupt and unclear.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.0

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task but lacks precision and variety. There are several spelling errors ('medicies', 'sponser', 'mainatin', 'pharmocopiea', 'expendieture', 'ingriedients') and word choice issues ('relaying' instead of 'relying', 'left in the middle' instead of 'abandoned'). These errors occasionally impede the reader's understanding. To reach a higher band, you should focus on using more academic vocabulary and ensuring the correct spelling of technical terms related to the topic.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The essay relies heavily on simple sentence structures, and there are frequent grammatical errors throughout the text. Issues include subject-verb agreement ('government should has', 'investigators has to do'), incorrect article usage, and awkward sentence construction ('cancer is on of the major increasing disease'). Punctuation is also inconsistent, with spaces before commas and periods. While the meaning is generally conveyed, the high frequency of errors makes the writing less professional and harder to read.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.