Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-08-22

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Nowadays, many medical research projects are funded by private companies. In your opinion, do you think that research should be carried by private companies, individuals or government?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

IN MODERN SOCIETY , NUMEROUS MEDICAL EXPLORATION PROJECTS ARE CAPILALIZED BY THE PRIVATE INDUSRIES. FROM MY PERSPECTIVE , I BELIEVE THAT THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD WORK ON THE MEDICAL INVESTIGATION , BECAUSE IF GOVERNMENT FUDES THE MEDICAL PROJECTS THEN IT CAN ALSO PROVIDE FACILITES TO THE INDIVIDUALS.

THE TOPIC WILL BE EXPLICATED WITH REVELANT IDEAS AND EXAMPLES.

FIRST OF ALL , ITS THE GOVERNMENT RESPONSIBILTY TO LOOK AFTER THE WELFARE OF THE MEDICAL STUDENTS OR MEDICAL FIELD . IF THE PROJECT IS FUNDED BY THE PUBLIC SERVENTS THEN RESRECHERS WILL GET POWER TO WORK FOR THE SOCIETY . ALTHOUGH IF IT IS FUNDED BY THE PRIVATE COPERATION THEN IT CAN BE MUCH BENIFICAL FOR THE PUBLIC. ALL FAME WILL GO IN PRIVATE COMPAINES HAND WHICH PRESENTS DETREMINAL IMAGE IN THE SOCITY.

ON THE OTHER HAND , THEY ARE NUMEROS DISADVANTAGES SUCH AS PRIVATE COMAPINES WILL SURGE MORE REPUTATION THAN REGIME. MOREOVER THE RESERCH PROJECTS CAN NOT BE EASILY ACCESSED TO THE PUBLIC . ITS THE WORK OF THE GOVERMENT TO ASSIST THE PROJECTS AND HELPS IN THE WELFARE OF THE COUNTRY . IN CONTEMPRARY SOCIETY , THE GOVERNMENT IS GETTING BACKSTAPPED BECAUSE OF THE PRIVATE INDUSTIRES . THE YOUTH OF THE COUNTRY IS GETTING FOR DEPENDED ON PRIVATE INICIATIVESN RATHER THAN ADMINISTRATION .

IN CONCLUSION , I STRONLY BELEIVE THAT THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD FINANCE THE MEDICAL FORECAST NOT PRIVATE ORGANISATION. AS IT GIVIES FACILIES TO THE PUBLIC MORE IF IT IS ASSISTED BY THE AUTORITY . HOWEVER , THE MEDICAL RESEARCH IS BENEFICAL FOR THE MEDICAL FIELD AND HEALTHCARE CENTERS

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0

The response addresses the prompt by taking a clear position that the government should fund medical research. However, the development of ideas is limited and often repetitive. For instance, the argument that private companies seek 'fame' or 'reputation' is not fully explored or supported with concrete examples. The reasoning regarding why government funding is superior is somewhat circular, relying on general statements about 'welfare' rather than specific benefits like public health accessibility or long-term societal gain. To improve, you should provide more detailed explanations and specific examples to support your claims, ensuring each paragraph contributes to a deeper understanding of your position.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.0

The essay is organized into paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the structure. However, the logical progression between ideas is often weak. Transitions like 'First of all' and 'On the other hand' are used, but the internal flow within paragraphs is disjointed. For example, the transition from discussing government responsibility to the negative image of private companies is abrupt. Additionally, some sentences are confusing, such as 'the government is getting backstapped because of the private industries,' which hinders the overall flow. Using a wider range of cohesive devices and ensuring that each sentence logically follows the previous one would significantly improve the coherence of your writing.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.0

The vocabulary is quite limited and there are frequent spelling errors throughout the text, such as 'CAPILALIZED' (capitalized), 'INDUSRIES' (industries), 'FUDES' (funds), 'RESERCH' (research), and 'COPERATION' (corporation). These errors are distracting and occasionally impede communication. While you attempt to use some topic-specific vocabulary like 'medical exploration' and 'private initiatives,' the range is narrow and often repetitive. To reach a higher band, you need to focus on accurate spelling and expanding your vocabulary to include more precise, academic terms that are relevant to the topic of medical research and public policy.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The essay relies heavily on simple sentence structures, and there are frequent grammatical errors that affect clarity. Issues include incorrect verb forms ('if government fudes'), missing articles ('in the society'), and awkward phrasing ('the youth of the country is getting for depended on'). There is a lack of complex sentence structures, which limits your ability to express more sophisticated ideas. To improve, focus on mastering basic sentence construction, subject-verb agreement, and the correct use of articles. Practicing the use of complex sentences—such as using relative clauses or conditional structures—will help you demonstrate a wider grammatical range.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.