Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-09-02

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Nowadays, many medical research projects are funded by private companies. In your opinion, do you think that research should be carried by private companies, individuals or government?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

These days many medical research projects are sponsored by the private groups. In my point of view, I think that projects based on research must be done by the only public authorities.

Following the details of medical research projects funded by the private companies which are highly risky for the healthcare sytem. In my opinion, reserach based projects of medicine should be carried out by the government instead of individuals or other private companies due to uneven consequences because of insecure research methodology which may disturb the entire medical syste. While there are many other insecurities in regard with proper chemicalization in formation of reports. Additionally, there are more chances of corruption in terms of economic, as such projetcts are price taking and to manage this type of finance, it requires a transparent accountability system.

However, it is challenging to avoid individuals from medical research specifically to the concerned students. Therefore, a complete mechanism for projects is very essential, which is possible within public authorities. Similarly, general recruitment for required staff to support the research based projects in the field of medical can be made through transparent system. Moreover, research is possible with the approval of the government by signing the memorandum of understandings between private companies and authorities. In terms of specific areas to keep only for the purose of research may also be finalized by the legal board.

In conclusion, as for as my concern which always supports the centralised research system for highly sensitive areas which include healthcare. And I strongly like the governmental role at first in the research methodology.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5

The response addresses the prompt by expressing a clear preference for government-funded medical research. However, the development of ideas is limited. While you mention corruption and the need for transparency, these points are not fully explored or supported with concrete examples. The argument remains somewhat abstract, and the discussion regarding the role of individuals and private companies is underdeveloped. To improve, you should provide specific, real-world examples of why government oversight is superior or how private funding has historically failed, rather than relying on general assertions. The position is clear, but the supporting arguments lack the depth required for a higher band.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5

The essay is organized into paragraphs, but the logical flow is often disrupted by awkward phrasing and unclear transitions. For example, the sentence starting with 'Following the details of medical research...' is a fragment and does not logically connect to the previous paragraph. While you use some cohesive devices like 'Additionally' and 'In conclusion', they are sometimes used mechanically or in ways that do not accurately reflect the relationship between ideas. The progression of arguments is occasionally difficult to follow because the sentences themselves are often disjointed, making the overall structure feel somewhat fragmented.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task but lacks precision and variety. There are several instances of awkward word choices, such as 'proper chemicalization' and 'projects are price taking,' which are not standard English collocations and impede clarity. You rely on a limited range of vocabulary, often repeating terms like 'research' and 'projects' frequently. To achieve a higher score, you should focus on using more precise academic terminology and ensuring that your word choices are contextually appropriate. Spelling errors, such as 'sytem' and 'reserach,' also occur, though they do not entirely prevent the reader from understanding your meaning.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors that affect the flow of the text. Many sentences are poorly constructed, such as 'In my point of view, I think that projects based on research must be done by the only public authorities.' There are also issues with article usage, subject-verb agreement, and sentence fragments. While the meaning is generally understandable, the high frequency of errors in basic grammar and punctuation prevents the writing from being considered fluent. You should focus on proofreading for basic sentence structure and ensuring that your complex sentences are grammatically sound.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.