Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-09-06
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Nowadays, many medical research projects are funded by private companies. In your opinion, do you think that research should be carried by private companies, individuals or government?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
In a recent years,it is generally acknowledged that projects of medical reasearch is highly funded by non-government firms.In my opinion,the reasearch should be highly covered by government and private firms ,which has more capable to fulfill the requirement of the projects.In upcoming i elaborate the reason behind this notion as there are ample of reasons behind it and formed a well -founded conclusion
Firstly,commencing with the non-government authorities who has more fund to fulfill the demands of projects.To elaborate it medical projects are very expensive and non profitable firms are not able to complete the whole process so ,the top multinational companies are highly accepted to complete the medical reasearch programs.If the demand of material is completed then there is high chance that result should come in postive outcome.For example,the most product in medical line was constructed by profitable firms.Moreover,the private firms are very caring in nature.They observe a every single step as highly important.The staff hier by the company is well educated and have a responsible behaviour.Therefore,it is highly believed by my point of view that permission towards the reasearch should be given to private top companies.
On the other side,the government authorities have more power and more accessible of material. To Elaborate it,government funded companies have more permission and it is firstly considered as dominant player in the market.The hier government employees is highly educated and have knowledge how to work on it.The material like dead bodies which is necessity for medical research is provided more to government authorities rather than private companies.Therefore,the high outcomes from top government associations.For example,the medical products are highly recommend in market.
To conclude,medical reasearch is highly recommend great fund and more accessible of material specially like dead bodies.
Both government and highly profitable private firms are able to make medical reasearch.It is not a small operation it requires a good team and equipment for making it possible.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5
The response addresses the prompt by discussing both private and government funding. However, the development is limited. While you state your opinion that both should be involved, the arguments are somewhat repetitive and lack specific, real-world examples. For instance, mentioning 'dead bodies' as a primary example of government-accessible material is quite narrow and lacks the depth expected for an academic essay. To improve, focus on providing more nuanced arguments regarding the benefits and drawbacks of each funding source, such as the profit-driven nature of private research versus the public-interest focus of government-funded projects.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5
The essay is organised into paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the structure. However, the use of cohesive devices is often mechanical or inaccurate, such as 'In upcoming i elaborate' or 'To Elaborate it'. Some transitions feel forced, and the logical flow between sentences is occasionally disrupted by awkward phrasing. The conclusion is also quite abrupt and does not effectively synthesise the points made in the body paragraphs. Improving the variety and naturalness of linking words will help the ideas flow more smoothly.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.0
The vocabulary is limited and often repetitive. There are frequent errors in word choice and collocation, such as 'hier' instead of 'hired', 'highly accepted' instead of 'well-suited', and 'more accessible of material' instead of 'better access to materials'. These errors sometimes make the meaning unclear. To reach a higher band, you should work on using more precise academic vocabulary and ensuring that words are used in their correct grammatical context.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0
There are frequent grammatical errors throughout the text, including subject-verb agreement issues ('projects of medical reasearch is'), missing articles, and incorrect word forms ('reasearch' is misspelled throughout). Sentence structures are generally simple, and attempts at complex sentences often contain errors that impede clarity. To improve, focus on basic sentence construction, subject-verb agreement, and proofreading for common spelling mistakes. Increasing the variety of sentence structures while maintaining accuracy is essential for a higher score.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.