Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.5 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-10-14

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Nowadays, many medical research projects are funded by private companies. In your opinion, do you think that research should be carried by private companies, individuals or government?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 4.5)

contemporary , multiple clinical plans are supported through commercial institutions .In your believe however clinical needs to be excecuted commercial enterprise, person, administration . off course commercial company's, administration firm , rich guy supports scientific study furthermore it is very crucial for our society in additionally new innovations , invention must taken for prosperity society and compete world

I believe that public authorities provide financial support to biotechnology to improvement in genetics in additionally medical researchers as well as deliver financial assistance in genetic diseases , vaccinations.Address problem in genetic engineering moreover drug development, genetic engineering and drug development , agriculture biotechnology as well as foof security for example Dna was discovered by Friedrich miescher in 1869 meanwhile watson and crick proposed double helix dna structure in 1953 who brought revolution in medical research field

financial support through person and commercial institution also play vital role in university research projects and long term project furthermore pharmacist should courage through financial aid to discover better drugs and medicine to cure diseases as well as developing better wayto determine disease diagnosis disorder for example penicillin was discovered by Alexander Fleming in 1928

who become fist antibiotic to cure ailmentssave millions of people

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5

You attempt to answer who should fund medical research and state that public authorities should support biotechnology, while also acknowledging contributions from individuals and companies. The examples of DNA research and penicillin are relevant to medical science, but they do not clearly demonstrate why one funding source is preferable or how the different sources should share responsibility. Your position is difficult to identify in the opening, and the discussion remains limited and under-developed. The response also does not meet the required minimum of 250 words, which restricts how fully you can explain and support your ideas. To strengthen the response, state your preference directly, give reasons for it, and develop each reason with a clear explanation and a relevant example.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5

There is some paragraphing: the response moves from an opening statement to government support and then to private and individual funding. This gives the reader a basic sense of topic grouping. However, the progression within paragraphs is difficult to follow, and several ideas are placed together without clear links, such as the list of genetics, vaccinations, drug development, agriculture and food security. Connectors including “furthermore,” “moreover” and “for example” are used, but they do not consistently show the relationship between the points. The opening is also hard to interpret, so the overall argument lacks a clear direction. Organise the essay around a stated position and a small number of reasons, using each paragraph to explain one main point and its example.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You attempt topic-specific vocabulary, including “biotechnology,” “genetic engineering,” “vaccinations,” “drug development” and “financial support.” These terms show an effort to discuss medical research rather than relying only on general language. However, the range is limited and many expressions are inaccurate or unnatural, which sometimes makes the intended meaning difficult to understand. For example, “clinical plans” and “rich guy supports scientific study” are not suitable academic expressions, while “foof security” and “ailmentssave” contain spelling or spacing problems. Aim for precise, conventional collocations and check spelling carefully. Replacing informal or unclear phrases with terms such as “research projects,” “wealthy donors” and “food security” would make the argument clearer and more appropriate in tone.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

The response attempts to combine ideas using longer structures, including “I believe that public authorities provide financial support…” and clauses introduced by “for example” and “who.” However, sentence boundaries and grammatical relationships are often unclear, and there is little evidence of consistently controlled sentence forms. For instance, the opening contains fragments and an unclear question structure, while “in addition new innovations, invention must taken” lacks a clear subject–verb pattern and an auxiliary in the passive construction. Articles, verb forms and punctuation are also frequently inaccurate, as in “who become fist antibiotic.” These errors often make the reader work to interpret the message. Practise writing complete sentences with one main idea, then check subject–verb agreement, articles, verb forms and full stops.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.