Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.5 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-10-14

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Nowadays, many medical research projects are funded by private companies. In your opinion, do you think that research should be carried by private companies, individuals or government?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 4.5)

Contemporary several clinical exploration supports through commercial institutions.In your believe however clinical needs to be executed commercial enterprise, person, administration.offcourse administration authorities supports investigation scientific plans furthermore it is very crucial for our society additionally leads to innovations, inventions which cause prosperity of any country and compete world .I discuss biotechnology process ,genetic engineering research process .

I believe that public authorities provides

financial support to scientist institution and university research moreover delivers every tools and machinery require for investigation process furthermore research happen in biotechnology field .it vast field in science which diagnosis diseases cures them with best drugs and made vaccinations, medicine as well as supports provide in agriculture biotechnology which insure food security ,good qualities seeds for crops and genetically modified plants which can conflict and tolerance diseases for example dna was discovered by Friedrich miescher in 1869 meanwhile Watson and crick model of double helix dna was discovered in 1953

in additionally government should also support financially genetic engineering and pharmaceutical industries which brought revolution in our society for example penicillin was discovered by sir Alexander Fleming in 1928 which first antibiotic in history against bacteria and microorganisms and genetic engineering in which Dna recombinant technology introduce who revolution in animal and plants for example frezan cow produce milk above 60 liters and second example golden rice produced and crop resistant diseases provide

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5

The response takes a position in favour of government funding and gives relevant examples from biotechnology, agriculture and medicine, including DNA research, penicillin and golden rice. These examples show an attempt to support the main view. However, the task asks you to consider whether research should be carried out by private companies, individuals or government, and the response focuses almost entirely on government support. It does not explain the roles or limitations of private companies and individuals, so the comparison is incomplete. Several points, such as the benefits of genetic engineering, are named but not clearly explained or linked to why government is the best funder. The response is also 23 words below the required minimum. Develop the comparison and explain each example’s relevance to your position.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.0

There is a recognisable central position—government should support research—and the response groups some related examples together, such as biotechnology and pharmaceutical research. However, the ideas are not arranged into a clear progression: the opening is difficult to follow, and the body moves from general government funding to DNA history, then to penicillin and agricultural examples without clear links. Connectors such as “furthermore,” “in additionally” and “for example” are attempted, but they do not consistently show the relationship between ideas. Paragraphing is also limited, with the final section appearing as one long, unfinished block. Use a clear introduction, separate body paragraphs for distinct reasons, and a conclusion; make each paragraph develop one point in a logical order.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The response attempts topic-specific vocabulary, including “genetic engineering,” “biotechnology,” “vaccinations,” “food security” and “DNA recombinant technology.” This gives the reader some sense of the subject and shows an effort to use less common terms. However, word choice and collocation are often inaccurate or unclear, as in “clinical exploration supports through commercial institutions,” “conflict and tolerance diseases,” and “financial support to scientist institution.” Some expressions appear to be direct translations and make the intended meaning difficult to identify. Spelling and word forms also need attention, including “offcourse” and “frezan.” Build a reliable set of research-related collocations and check that each technical term is used accurately in context.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

The response attempts some longer structures, including clauses linked with “which” and “for example,” but control is weak and many sentences are difficult to parse. For instance, “public authorities provides financial support” has a subject–verb agreement error, while “which first antibiotic in history” lacks a complete verb structure. Articles, plurals and sentence boundaries are also frequently missing or inaccurate, as in “supports investigation scientific plans” and the long sentence beginning “it vast field in science.” These problems sometimes obscure the relationships between ideas. Practise building accurate simple sentences first, then combine them with controlled relative clauses and conjunctions. Use full stops to separate complete ideas and check agreement, articles and verb forms during editing.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.