Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-10-16

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Nowadays, many medical research projects are funded by private companies. In your opinion, do you think that research should be carried by private companies, individuals or government?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is a colossal upsurge in the number of people believing that most if medical projects supported by private conpanies these days. There are a wide range of factors that account for why this is happening. I will discuss reasons which are beneficial for this phenomenon in upcoming paragraphs.

To commence with, there are a myriad reasons this soaring concern. The first and foremost is that private companies want to make their name worldwide. In this way they spens a lot of money on medical research for their profit. As a result, after spending a huge amount of money in this project they get a large amount of money and become famous in other nations for their research. For instance, the atudy results published by government of Australia in March 2014 and April 2016 clearly indicate that medical projects are the biggest reason for popularity in other nations.

Moving further, this research should be completed by people and the government is more beneficial. Moreover, individuals shuold much time on these projects. As a result, experience from these plans which is very useful for finding a job in the future. Furthermore, spending money by government on these schemes is very useful for people because companies take a huge amount of money from local people who use these projects as compared with when government makes these projects, people can easily afford these facilities.

In conclusion, funded by private companies on these projects is very important for the nation but we do not neglect the negative impacts life of individuals, while the governments and people are much better options for these projects as compared to private companies.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You address the topic and give a position: you acknowledge private funding, then argue that government and individuals are better options because public projects may be more affordable. However, the response only partially answers the choice in the prompt. The discussion of private companies focuses mainly on their desire for profit and fame, while the reasons for involving individuals are brief and unclear; for example, “individuals shuold much time” does not explain what contribution they would make. The example about Australian research is asserted but not connected convincingly to your argument. Develop a clear, consistent position and explain each reason with a specific, relevant example or consequence.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response has an introduction, two body paragraphs and a conclusion, and signposting such as “To commence with,” “Moving further” and “In conclusion” helps identify the sections. However, the overall progression is not always clear: the first body paragraph supports private companies, while the next shifts to government and individuals without clearly explaining how this relates to the earlier argument. Some linking phrases are repetitive or do not show the relationship between ideas, and references such as “these projects” and “these schemes” are not always precise. Organise the body around clearly stated reasons for your chosen position, and use linking expressions to show contrast, cause and result accurately.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You attempt a range of topic-related and formal vocabulary, including “medical research,” “funded,” “profit,” “afford” and “negative impacts.” This gives you some flexibility in discussing the issue. However, several word choices and collocations are inaccurate or awkward, such as “a colossal upsurge in the number of people believing,” “spens a lot of money” and “the atudy results.” These errors sometimes make the intended meaning harder to follow. There are also spelling errors, including “conpanies,” “shuold” and “atudy.” Aim for precise, natural phrases rather than elaborate expressions, and proofread spelling and word forms carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a result clause beginning “As a result” and a contrast introduced by “while.” However, complex sentences are often faulty, and frequent errors affect clarity. For example, “most if medical projects supported by private conpanies” lacks a clear grammatical structure, while “experience from these plans which is very useful” is an incomplete sentence. There are also problems with verb forms and agreement, as in “individuals shuold much time” and “companies take … as compared with when government makes.” Practise building complete sentences with a clear subject and verb, then check agreement, articles and punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.