Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-10-19

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Nowadays, many medical research projects are funded by private companies. In your opinion, do you think that research should be carried by private companies, individuals or government?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Medical research develops the health science at an atmost level, which helps in development of more benificial medication. One group of community believes that in today's time the most of fund was come from private companies for reasearch. In my opinion the private sectore is more benificial then the individuals and government, my argument will elaborated in further paragraphes.

Among all reasons why private funding is batter then other, one the main reason is that it gives batter production. The private companies get large profit from the sucess reasearch so the do heard work for developing new things. In addition, it improves employment. The companies hiers the emploies who have suffisiant knowledge for project and also gives them high packge of salary.

In contrast, by individuals heandling reaserch project gives financial burden. The research need large amount of mony for experiment and other stuf if the individual paid it, and it fail will give large financial loss. Moreover, it has chance of missmanagement. there is onle oneperson to manage all reasearch and fund which have chance of mistake can happend.

However, if the goverment sector counduct research it takes long time. in goverment process need various approvel and permisions for funding and trying somthing new which is very time consuming. Ferther more, the government has already number of sectors for funding if the research also add in that will increased burden of regulatory bodies.

In conclusion, All sectors can conduct reseaech but private one is more sutable then the individuals and government sector.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear: you favour private companies over individuals and government, and you address all three options. The reasons are relevant, including the possibility of profit motivating research, employment opportunities, the financial risk for individuals, and delays in government processes. This gives the response a solid basis. However, some points are asserted rather than explained: for example, the link between profit and “better production” is unclear, and the employment point is not directly connected to research quality. The claims about government approvals and regulatory burdens would also benefit from a specific example or explanation. Developing these ideas more fully and showing how they support your preference would make the argument more convincing and complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a coherent overall arrangement: an introduction states your view, separate paragraphs consider private companies, individuals and government, and a conclusion restates your preference. Connectors such as “In addition,” “In contrast,” and “However” help signal the relationships between points. At times, though, the progression feels mechanical, and some links are not fully clear. For instance, “However” introduces the government paragraph even though it does not directly contrast with the preceding point about individuals. The conclusion is also very brief and does not draw together the reasons. Use transitions that express the precise relationship between ideas, and add clearer links within paragraphs so each supporting point follows naturally from the previous one.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You attempt vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “financial burden,” “employment,” “financial loss,” and “regulatory bodies,” and the reader can generally identify your intended meaning. However, the range is limited and many spelling and word-choice errors make the writing less clear, such as “atmost,” “benificial,” “reasearch,” and “hiers.” Some combinations are also unnatural: “gives batter production” does not clearly express the intended benefit, while “high packge of salary” is not idiomatic. These issues are noticeable throughout and sometimes require the reader to infer your meaning. Build accuracy by checking spelling carefully and learning common academic collocations, such as “fund research,” “conduct research,” and “offer competitive salaries.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including conditional structures such as “if the individual paid it, and it fail will give large financial loss.” This shows an effort to express cause and consequence, but the structure is difficult to follow because the verb forms and clause order are not controlled. Other examples include “the most of fund was come” and “the research need,” where tense, agreement and sentence construction are inaccurate. Capitalisation and punctuation are also inconsistent, as in “in goverment process” after a full stop. These errors recur and can make some relationships unclear. Practise building accurate subject–verb–object sentences first, then add subordinate clauses, checking verb forms and agreement in each clause.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.