Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-10-22

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Nowadays, many medical research projects are funded by private companies. In your opinion, do you think that research should be carried by private companies, individuals or government?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

To commence that research projects are funded by private companies.In this paragraph we will discuss about how research would be conducted. It would be conducted though private companies, government or a person individually.

Firs of all medical research should not be conducted by private companies because private companies have limited sources of research they couldn't conducted huge level of researches they only conducted small scale researches. Now a days their are many government companies who funded the private companies and conducted the research. Private companies results not be verified their results depends on the basis of imagination.

While on the other hand if any government company will conducted the research i think it would be authentic. Because they have many sources and information before conducted the research. Government conducted the research on huge level and there results always be aunthitc. Because they higher the well educated and experienced person whoe conducted the research.

In my opinion research always be individually.In this way people can work heartdely and use thire own experience. When an individual person conducted the research he or she use all types if sources they build better plsns about their research. They conducted surveys, questioner and all types of sources which are helpful in thier research. They collected the information thorugh various websites, seminars and other social apps . They also use internet foe help. They use thire all efforts which make the results powerful and authentic.

In conclusion research should be individually in this way people work effectively and we got better results. Thet put their all efforts on the project.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You address the choice among private companies, government and individuals, and your conclusion clearly favours individual research. You also give reasons, such as researchers using their own experience and gathering information from surveys and websites. However, the position is not consistently supported: the opening says the essay will discuss how research is conducted, while the body argues against private companies and then government without explaining the comparison in depth. Claims such as government results “always” being authentic and individuals producing “powerful” results are broad and need relevant examples or explanation. Develop one or two specific reasons for your preferred option and acknowledge a limitation or counterargument to make the response more complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, separate paragraphs about private companies, government and individuals, and a conclusion. This helps readers identify the main topics. However, progression between ideas is often mechanical or unclear. Phrases such as “Firs of all” and “While on the other hand” signal transitions, but the relationship between points is not always developed; the paragraph about government, for example, repeats that its research is authentic without building a clear argument. The opening also promises a discussion rather than stating your position, which weakens the overall direction. Use topic sentences that directly support your view, connect each reason to its explanation, and avoid repeating the same claim in the conclusion.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some task-related vocabulary, including “medical research,” “sources,” “surveys,” “information” and “authentic,” so the reader can follow the general subject. However, the range is limited and several words or phrases are repeated, particularly “conducted the research,” “sources” and “results.” There are also noticeable spelling and word-choice problems, such as “aunthitc,” “heartdely,” “questioner” and “social apps,” which can make parts of the argument harder to understand. Some combinations are unnatural, including “huge level of researches” and “work effectively.” Build a more precise set of research-related expressions and check spelling and collocations; this will help you express distinctions between funding, conducting and evaluating research.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

You attempt both simple and longer sentences, including clauses beginning with “because” and “when,” but control is inconsistent. Errors in verb forms and agreement occur frequently: “they couldn't conducted,” “government will conducted,” and “he or she use” should use appropriate verb forms. Sentence boundaries and punctuation also need attention: the opening runs together after “companies,” and “Because they have many sources” is left as a fragment. Articles, plurals and sentence construction are often inaccurate, as in “a person individually” and “all types if sources.” These patterns sometimes make the reader pause to interpret your meaning. Practise accurate simple sentences first, then add subordinate clauses, checking each sentence for a complete main clause and consistent verb forms.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.