Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-10-23

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Nowadays, many medical research projects are funded by private companies. In your opinion, do you think that research should be carried by private companies, individuals or government?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Medical research pojects these days, are thriving because of proper financial aids provided by private companies , individuals or the government. Most of the private companies are now showing much interest in funding these medical experiment programs. Considering any government's or individual's financial assistance, it is my firm belief that more and more private sectors should come forward to inject cash on those medical researches.

First and foremost, healthy competition is the reason for which i support the idea of private sector's investment in the medicalresearch projects. Because, every stakeholders there will try to innovate something that will not only be a blessing for medical science but also boost thier market value. Nevertheless, the companies will be ready to make cash flow into these research that will benefit both the scenarios. For example, different companies are releasing newmedical equipments every year that have newly added features.

Furthermore, as for government's or any individual's funding, there are some disadvantages such as government's budget-limit issue , monopoly and uncompetative research , and small amount fundings. Individuals can not contribute that much compared to private sectors and there will be no competition also. And the government can't exceed the budget . So , the best option is that private companies should come forward to continue the trend . And there is a proof that it actually works better that way . Almost hundreds of companies all over the world launching their medical products and drugs which seems a blessing to medical science.

In light of the aforementioned facts and discussions, I completely back the idea that private companies should lead the medical research project to bring the best possible result and innovation.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you believe private companies should lead medical research, and you give relevant reasons, especially competition and the potential for innovation. The example of companies releasing medical equipment with new features helps illustrate this argument. You also address government and individual funding, so the response covers the main options in the question. However, these alternatives are treated less fully: claims about budget limits, monopoly and small funding are asserted rather than explained or supported. The link between competition and better medical outcomes also needs clearer development. To strengthen the response, explain how private investment can improve research while acknowledging safeguards needed to ensure public health, rather than commercial value alone, guides decisions.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a coherent overall structure: an introduction states your view, two body paragraphs present reasons, and the conclusion restates your position. Sequencing phrases such as “First and foremost,” “Furthermore,” and “In light of the aforementioned facts” make the progression easy to follow. However, some connections are mechanical or unclear. For example, “Nevertheless” does not clearly contrast with the preceding point, and “both the scenarios” has no precise reference. The third paragraph also moves quickly from disadvantages of government and individual funding to the conclusion, without clearly separating or developing each comparison. Use linking expressions that show the exact relationship between ideas, and make references explicit so readers can follow the argument without having to infer what a phrase means.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a relevant range of topic vocabulary, including “healthy competition,” “financial assistance,” “medical science,” and “market value,” which helps communicate your argument. There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “come forward” and “in light of the aforementioned facts.” However, inaccurate word choice, collocation and spelling reduce precision: “financial aids,” “medical experiment programs,” “make cash flow into,” and “small amount fundings” are not natural expressions in this context. Several spelling errors, including “pojects,” “thier,” and “uncompetative,” also affect the impression of control. Aim for accurate, natural combinations such as “provide funding for research” and “medical research projects,” and proofread carefully for spelling and spacing.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a conditional-style explanation beginning “Because” and a relative clause in “products and drugs which seems a blessing.” The main argument remains understandable, but some grammatical errors occur in sentence construction, agreement, articles and punctuation. For instance, “Because, every stakeholders there will try” is an incomplete and awkwardly punctuated construction, while “products and drugs which seems” has a plural subject with a singular verb. The sentence beginning “Considering any government's or individual's financial assistance” is also difficult to parse. Improve control by making each sentence complete, checking subject–verb agreement, and using commas and apostrophes consistently. More accurate complex sentences would make your reasoning clearer.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.