Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-10-27

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Nowadays, many medical research projects are funded by private companies. In your opinion, do you think that research should be carried by private companies, individuals or government?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In contemporary era, research is highlight topic for every country. In present time, few medical research projects are donated by corporate sectors. This essay will articulate my opnion and reasons in the upcoming paragraphs.

To commence with the first point of view that, the research should be carried by private authorities because private companies have enough fund to use. To be more precise, sometimes it is important to include private sectors for assist and guidance because few government employees are not well organised and not have proper skills. Further, individual who are wrok in corporate sectors they have enough skills and knoweldge about medical field than government authority. For instance, in present time a vaccine which is used for cervical cancer is generated by private company and government authority also help in this project. Consequently, research which is used in medical field and provide modern techonological advancement done by private sectors.

Another compelling reason in support this view is that, private organisation have enough support from another non government organisation. Furthermore, employees who are working in private sectors they have accountability for their specific projects or work than the government employees. Later, the head of private company also have responsibility for company reputation around country. To elaborate further on this point, private sectors have better technology than the government authority. Also employees have better decision making and problem solving skill for carry out reserach project.

To recapitulate, some medical researchs are carried out from private authototies. I believe the notion give my reasons for choosing private companies in medical research projects. Therefore, i firmly agree with to give research projects to private sectors.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.5
Coherence and Cohesion6.0
Lexical Resource5.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.5

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

Your position is clear: you support private companies conducting medical research, and you give relevant reasons, including funding, expertise, technology and accountability. The cervical-cancer vaccine example also helps connect your argument to a real application. However, the response addresses the choice among private companies, individuals and government only partly: it mainly argues for private companies and does not explain whether individuals or government should have a role, despite mentioning government assistance briefly. Several claims, such as private employees having better skills and decision-making, are asserted rather than explained or supported. Develop each main reason with a clear explanation or example, and clarify how public and private research responsibilities should be divided.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs and a conclusion. Ideas generally move from the case for private funding and expertise to support, accountability and technology. Linking phrases such as “To commence with,” “Furthermore” and “To recapitulate” help signal stages in the argument. However, some transitions feel mechanical, and the second body paragraph repeats the general claim that private organisations are better without showing how each point builds on the previous one. The opening phrase “To commence with the first point of view that” also makes the relationship between ideas unclear. Use fewer formulaic connectors and organise each paragraph around one distinct reason, with explanation and evidence following it.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use some topic-relevant vocabulary, including “medical research projects,” “accountability,” “technology” and “problem solving,” so the reader can follow the general argument. There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “To elaborate further on this point.” However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate, including “research is highlight topic,” “projects are donated,” and “researchs are carried out from private authototies.” Spelling errors such as “opnion,” “wrok” and “knoweldge” further reduce precision. Build a more accurate set of phrases for funding, conducting research and describing expertise, and check spelling and word forms carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and longer sentence forms, and the overall meaning is usually recoverable. However, control is inconsistent, particularly in complex clauses and sentence openings. For example, “private companies have enough fund to use” lacks a clear grammatical construction, while “individual who are wrok … they have” has problems with agreement and clause structure. In “private organisation have enough support,” the subject and verb do not agree, and “I firmly agree with to give research projects” is not a complete, well-formed expression of your position. Practise building accurate subject–verb patterns and complete clauses before adding linking phrases. Greater control of articles, plurals and sentence boundaries would make the argument easier to read.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.