Band 4.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-11-03

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Nowadays, many medical research projects are funded by private companies. In your opinion, do you think that research should be carried by private companies, individuals or government?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 4.0)

in the medical fields thare are worked all the year for advance search and make new medicine . this is a very curical parts of every counters.

the medicial science is developed day by day because of the essential part of individuals. whenvere people have needed to be everydar of living.

the international level all organization thay are connected to the giverments by use of projects and reserches perposal .. in other hand public companies should be collect data all benifical medicines .

young youth want to te research the biological history for inventing new things for helping of persons.

goverments should be published all articals of local brand because there were be able to organize medicines.

private companies cannot afford all expensives for show the articals. therefor establish owns brand for allowig a letter of goverments.those would have been assist for urban peoples.

for instance the research of any tablets would be wented to perfect illness is benificall.

in my opinion goverments should be vital parts of all those atomes wherever able to show and afford all expensives of use for ready to artical in local market even international levels.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 3.5

You identify government as the main funder in the final sentence, and you refer to research, medicine costs, and public access, so the response is connected to the topic. However, the position is not clearly established until the end, and the discussion does not adequately compare government, private companies, and individuals, as the question asks. Points such as “young youth want to te research” and companies being unable to afford expenses are difficult to interpret and are not supported with clear examples. The response also contains 191 words, below the required 250, so there is not enough space to develop the argument. State your view in the introduction, address the alternatives directly, and explain each reason with a specific example.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 3.5

There is a loose movement from the importance of medical research to the roles of organisations and then to your opinion that governments should lead. This gives the reader a basic sense of the topic and direction. However, the ideas are not arranged into clear paragraphs, and the links between them are often unclear: for example, the sentence about young people researching biological history does not connect clearly to the following claim about governments publishing articles. Connectives such as “in other hand” and “therefor” are attempted but do not reliably show the intended relationship. Organise the response into an introduction, separate reason paragraphs, and a conclusion, using clear links such as “however,” “for example,” and “therefore” only where their meanings fit.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

You attempt topic-related vocabulary, including “medical fields,” “researches,” “medicines,” “biological history,” and “expenses.” This shows some effort to discuss the subject beyond very basic everyday language. However, spelling, word forms, and collocations are frequently inaccurate, and several choices make the intended meaning hard to understand: “curical parts,” “all benifical medicines,” and “perfect illness” are examples. Some wording is also repetitive, particularly references to “all” and “goverments.” Build a reliable set of phrases for this topic, such as “fund medical research,” “develop treatments,” and “make medicines affordable,” and check spelling and word combinations before submitting. More precise vocabulary would make your ideas clearer.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

The response attempts both short statements and longer sentence forms, including a reason introduced by “because” and a concluding sentence beginning “in my opinion.” This shows an effort to express relationships between ideas. However, sentence structure and basic grammatical patterns are often inaccurate, and many sentences are difficult to follow. For example, “the medicial science is developed day by day because of the essential part of individuals” has unclear article use and sentence construction, while “private companies cannot afford all expensives for show the articals” has faulty verb patterns. Capitalisation and punctuation are also inconsistent, including the opening lowercase letter and repeated full stops. Practise complete subject–verb sentences, articles, and infinitive patterns such as “to develop,” then proofread each sentence for clarity.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.