Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 4.5 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-11-05
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Student answer (Band 4.5)
The given chart compares the average of carbon dioxide (CO2) discharge every body in the UK, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal from 1967 to 2007.
Every person's carbon dioxide emissions from 1969 to 2007.
In this graph, mention the average between different countries. On the top, which country has the highest carbon dioxide discharge from 1969 to 2007 that is UK.In 1969, the UK had the highest emissions byt after some years, they slowly decreased up to 8 metrice tonnes.
Also, Portugal started discharging in 1969, at 1 metric tonne.And then after spending some years it well incresed upto 5.8 metrice tonnes. The starting difference between UK and Porgtugal is 1 to 11 metrice tonnes.And in 2007 the difference among this two country is 5.9 to 9.
Als the other countries will be incresed and decresed like Sweden in the start is ligh and after some year is decresed and Itlay is lower then Sweden but among few time is incresed 4 to 7.9 metrice tonnes.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 4.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 4.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 4.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5
You identify the UK as the highest-emitting country and note that its emissions declined, while Portugal rose over the period. However, the response only partially reports the graph’s main features and includes several inaccurate details: the period is 1967–2007, not 1969–2007; UK emissions ended at about 8.7 tonnes, not 8; and Portugal reached about 5.4 tonnes, not 5.8. The claim that Portugal “started discharging” is also misleading, as it already recorded emissions in 1967. Italy’s steady rise and its eventual position above Sweden are not clearly explained, and there is no concise overview of the contrasting trends. Select the key patterns and support them with accurate comparisons.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.0
There is some attempt to organise the response by country, and words such as “Also” and “after” signal addition and sequence. However, the ideas are not arranged coherently overall: the separate sentence “Every person's carbon dioxide emissions from 1969 to 2007” does not develop the introduction, and the response then shifts between the UK, Portugal, Sweden and Italy without a clear progression. Comparisons such as “the starting difference” are difficult to follow, and the final sentence combines several trends unclearly. Use a clear structure: introduction, overview of the main trends, then two focused comparison paragraphs. Make each sentence’s subject and comparison explicit.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
The response uses a small set of relevant terms, including “average,” “emissions,” “highest,” “decreased” and “increased,” so the general topic is usually recognisable. However, vocabulary is repetitive and several choices are inaccurate or awkward, such as “discharge every body,” “started discharging,” and “the other countries will be increased and decreased.” Spelling errors, including “metrice,” “incresed,” “Porgtugal” and “Itlay,” also make the writing less clear. Use the standard term “emissions” consistently and choose precise trend language, such as “rose steadily,” “fell,” or “remained stable.” Check spelling and word forms before submitting.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You attempt both simple statements and longer sentences, for example, “Also, Portugal started discharging in 1969, at 1 metric tonne. And then after spending some years it well incresed…” However, sentence structures are limited, and errors in tense, agreement, articles and punctuation occur frequently enough to make some relationships unclear. Examples include “the other countries will be incresed,” where the past trend needs a past-tense form, and “the UK.In 1969,” where punctuation is missing. The fragment “Every person's carbon dioxide emissions from 1969 to 2007” is not a complete sentence. Practise writing complete past-tense sentences and use commas and full stops to separate each comparison.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
