Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The grapgh is basically about the average carbon dioxide emissions per person in UK, Sweden, Italy, and portugal in the years between 1967 and 2007. It is divided into metric tonnes, In 1967 the portugal grapph raises the emission metric tonnes from 2 to approx 4 and half way which merges sweden as well by passing years 1977,1987 and 1997 and 2007, whereas the italy it raises the metric tonnes from 4 and goes inbetween 6 and 8 by the year 2007 but does not reach 8. In sweden the graph starts above 8 and goes high in 1977 upto 10 and comes down lowering in the year 1987 and 1997 and finally rearches at below 6 in 2007 CO2 emmission metric tonees,coming to United kimgdom it starts above 10 from 1967 and slowly goes down in different years in 1987 to 2007 between 8 and 10 and finally stops.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.0
Coherence and Cohesion4.5
Lexical Resource5.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You identify the four countries and the period, and you report several broad trends accurately: the UK declines gradually, Sweden peaks in 1977 before falling, and Italy and Portugal rise overall. However, the task is only partly addressed because there is no clear overview that selects the main comparisons, and some descriptions are unclear or inaccurate. For example, Portugal does not rise from 2 to about 4.5 in 1967; it starts at roughly 1 and climbs over the period to just above 5. Italy reaches about 7.6 by 1997 and remains there in 2007, rather than simply ending between 6 and 8. State the overall ranking and the contrasting trends clearly, then support them with selected figures.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5

The response follows a broadly chronological approach and moves through the countries, so the reader can identify the intended subject. However, it is presented as one long paragraph, with no distinct overview or clear grouping of the main trends. The repeated transitions “whereas,” “coming to,” and “and finally” do not consistently show how the information relates, and the long opening sentence combines several countries and years in a confusing way. Organise the report into an introduction, an overview, and two detail paragraphs—for example, grouping the declining UK and Sweden with the rising Italy and Portugal. Use shorter sentences and clearer comparisons to create a more logical progression.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant task vocabulary, including “emissions,” “metric tonnes,” “starts,” and “goes down,” which helps communicate the general subject and direction of change. However, the range is limited and several expressions are repetitive or imprecise, such as “raises the emission metric tonnes” and “goes high.” Spelling errors, including “grapgh,” “portugal,” “emmission,” and “kimgdom,” also make the writing less clear and polished. Choose standard trend language and use it accurately: describe figures as rising, falling, peaking, or remaining stable, and refer to emissions in tonnes per person. Check country names and key terms carefully before submitting.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response attempts to connect several ideas in longer sentences, but these structures are often difficult to follow. For instance, “In 1967 the portugal grapph raises the emission metric tonnes from 2 to approx 4 and half way which merges sweden as well” has an unclear clause structure, and the sentence beginning “In sweden the graph starts…” runs several stages together without clear punctuation. Tense and sentence patterns are also inconsistent, as in “it raises” when describing historical data. Use the past simple consistently for the period, and build shorter sentences with a clear subject and verb, such as “Portugal’s emissions rose from about 1 tonne in 1967 to just over 5 tonnes in 2007.” This will make the comparisons easier to understand.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.