Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-07-25

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The graph illustrates average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the countries between 1967 and 2007.

Overall, United Kingdom experienced the highest proportion although the period, but steady declined in Sweden. Italy and Portugal had gradually increase.

Carbon dioxide emissions per person in United Kingdom just under 11% in 1967, while, its slight climbed to around 9% in 2007. Sweden rose dramatically moe than 10% in 1977. After a slight decreased in 2007.

Itay rose steadily to just below 7% in 1977 . In 1977, its remained stable to around 8% in 2007. Portugal had the lowest proportion although out the period after its rose significantly to around 6% in 2007. United Kingdom experienced fall steadily approximately between 1967 and 2007.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.5
Coherence and Cohesion6.0
Lexical Resource6.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.5
Overall6.0

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5

The response fails to meet the minimum word count requirement of 150 words, which significantly impacts the task achievement score. While you have identified some main features, the analysis is incomplete and lacks the necessary detail to fully address the prompt. The data interpretation is also inconsistent; for example, you describe the UK as having a 'steady decline' while simultaneously stating it 'climbed' in 2007, which creates confusion. To improve, ensure you provide a clear overview, select key data points to support your descriptions, and ensure your summary is at least 150 words. The current length prevents a full development of the trends shown in the graph.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is organized into paragraphs, but the logical progression is hindered by the lack of sufficient content and some confusing transitions. You use some cohesive devices like 'Overall' and 'while', but the connections between sentences are often weak or mechanical. The referencing is sometimes unclear, such as in the second paragraph where the sequence of events is difficult to follow. To improve, focus on using a wider range of linking words to connect your ideas more fluidly and ensure that each paragraph has a clear, singular focus. The current structure feels fragmented due to the brevity of the response.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

Your vocabulary is generally adequate for the task but lacks the precision required for a higher band. You rely on basic descriptors like 'rose' and 'increased' repeatedly. There are also errors in word choice and collocation, such as 'proportion' when referring to CO2 emissions (which are measured in metric tonnes, not percentages) and 'slight climbed'. To improve, try to incorporate more varied verbs and adverbs to describe trends, such as 'fluctuated', 'peaked', or 'remained constant'. Additionally, ensure you are using the correct terminology for the data provided in the graph.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The response contains a mix of simple and some attempted complex structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede clarity. Issues include incorrect verb tenses (e.g., 'its slight climbed'), missing articles, and awkward sentence construction (e.g., 'After a slight decreased in 2007'). Punctuation is also inconsistent, particularly with the placement of commas. To improve, focus on subject-verb agreement and the correct use of past tense when describing historical data. Proofreading for basic errors like 'its' versus 'it' and ensuring consistent sentence structure will help raise your score.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.