Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-07-31

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

The information regarding average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 is illustrated by line chart.

Overall, it is vivid that the highest average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person was noticeable in Sweden. However, the least average carbon dioxide was experienced in Portugal.

To embark with, in the year 1967, the average carbon dioxide (CO2) emission per person in United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal was examined 10.2, 8.4, 4.2 and 1.2 respectively. Whereas, in the year 1977, the average carbon dioxide was noticed 10.2, 10.1, 6.1 and 2 in that order. Whilst, in the year 1987, the average was experienced 10, 7.4, 6.4 and 3 consecutively.

Moving further, in the year 1997, the average Carbon dioxide emissions per person in United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal was noticed 9, 6, 7.8 and 5.3 respectively. However, in 2007, average was 8.4, 5.2, 7.8 and 5.3.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The response covers all parts of the task by identifying the main trends and providing data for the four countries. However, the report is overly mechanical, relying on a list-like presentation of figures for each decade rather than synthesising the information into meaningful comparisons. While the overview identifies the highest and lowest emitters, it lacks a more nuanced summary of the overall trends (e.g., the convergence of emissions or the distinct decline in Sweden). The data is presented accurately, but the lack of analytical grouping prevents the response from reaching a higher band.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 7.0

The essay is organised into logical paragraphs, and there is a clear progression from the introduction to the body paragraphs. Cohesive devices are used, such as 'To embark with', 'Whereas', and 'Moving further', although some of these are used in a slightly unnatural or mechanical way. The referencing is generally clear, though the transition between the data points in the body paragraphs feels repetitive. The structure is sufficient to follow the writer's intent, but the flow could be improved by using more varied linking phrases.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.5

The vocabulary is adequate for the task, allowing the writer to describe the data clearly. However, the range is somewhat limited and repetitive, with phrases like 'average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person' and 'was noticed' appearing frequently. There is an attempt to use some topic-specific vocabulary, but it lacks the sophistication and flexibility required for higher bands. The word choice is generally accurate, and communication is never impeded, but the lack of variety in reporting verbs and descriptive language keeps the score at this level.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.5

The response uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. While the grammar is generally understandable, there are several persistent errors, such as 'is illustrated by line chart' (missing article) and 'the least average carbon dioxide was experienced' (inaccurate collocation). There are also issues with punctuation and preposition usage, such as 'in the year 1967... was examined 10.2'. These errors do not impede communication, but they demonstrate a lack of control over more complex grammatical structures, which is necessary for a higher band.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.