Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-09-01
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
If we talk about the carbon dioxide emmision the graph clearly says Itlay is on the top of the list. Following Itlay, Portugal secures second place in emission of carbon dioxide. However, there are two countries which become successful in keeping the graph downtrend that is United Kingdom and Sweden. If we talk about United Kingdom there was time when United Kingdom was a position 1st but due to some measures taken by Envoirmental Safety Department they successfully able to decrease the carbon dioxide levels and took the graph on lower side.
Although if we look on Sweden Progess we can see a rapid ratchet up in the carbon dioxide measures but Sweden also took very influential steps to remarkbly move the graph downward fastly and make a very sharp progess which need world appreciation
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 4.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 4.0
The response fails to meet the minimum word count requirement of 150 words, which significantly impacts the task achievement score. Furthermore, the report lacks a clear overview of the main trends and fails to provide specific data points or accurate comparisons from the graph. The analysis is overly descriptive and relies on subjective commentary (e.g., 'need world appreciation') rather than objective reporting of the data. To improve, you must ensure all parts of the prompt are addressed, include specific figures from the graph, and provide a clear summary of the overall trends observed over the 40-year period.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.0
The response lacks a clear structure. It is written as a single block of text rather than using distinct paragraphs for the introduction, overview, and body details. Cohesive devices are used in a very limited and repetitive manner, such as starting sentences with 'If we talk about'. The logical progression of ideas is weak, as the information is presented in a disjointed way without clear transitions between the countries or the time periods mentioned. Improving paragraphing and using a wider range of linking words would help the reader follow your argument more effectively.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.0
The vocabulary is quite limited and repetitive. There are several spelling errors, such as 'emmision', 'Itlay', 'Envoirmental', and 'progess'. The phrasing is often informal or imprecise, such as 'ratchet up' and 'took the graph on lower side'. To achieve a higher band, you should focus on using more precise academic vocabulary to describe trends, such as 'fluctuated', 'declined', 'peaked', or 'remained stable', and ensure that you proofread your work to eliminate basic spelling mistakes that distract the reader.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0
The response contains frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede clarity. Examples include 'there was time when United Kingdom was a position 1st' and 'they successfully able to decrease'. The sentence structures are mostly simple or contain errors when attempting more complex constructions. There is a lack of variety in sentence patterns, and punctuation is inconsistent. To improve, focus on subject-verb agreement, correct use of articles, and ensuring that your sentences are grammatically complete. Practicing the construction of complex sentences with accurate conjunctions will also help improve your range.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
