Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-09-28

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

The chart displays information about the main producers of carbondioxide release per person in four different countries i.e. UK, Sweden, Italy and Portugal from thw year 1967 to 2007.

Overall, the CO2 fumes were maximum for Britian in 1967 with almost 11 metric tonnes, but this number gradually fell down to nearly 9 metric tonnes in 2007. On the other hand, Portugese CO2 exhausts which started off with the lowest 1 metric tonnes in 1967, escalated dramaticallly to almost 6 metric tonnes in 2007.

In contrast, Sweden and Italy showed fluctuated CO2 emissions with over 8 metric tonnes and 4 metric tonnes of carbondioxide release in 1967 resspectively. Emissions from Swedish people showed a maximum release of CO2 in 1977 with over 10 metric tonnes. This number declined to almost 7 metric tonnes in 1987 anf finally to under 6 metric tonnes in 2007. Italians starting of with just over 4 metric tonnes of CO2 exhausts in 1967, ended with about 8 metric tonnes in 2007.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.5
Coherence and Cohesion6.5
Lexical Resource6.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy6.0
Overall6.5

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

The student successfully addresses all parts of the task by selecting and reporting the main features of the line graph. An appropriate overview is provided in the second paragraph, capturing the overall trends of the UK and Portugal. Key data points are accurately cited, such as the UK starting at nearly 11 metric tonnes and falling to 8.7, and Portugal rising from 1 to 5.4 metric tonnes. The fluctuations in Sweden and Italy are also correctly highlighted and supported with figures from the chart. The response covers all four countries effectively and makes relevant comparisons throughout, meeting all requirements for Task Achievement at a Band 7.0 level.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The text is logically organised into four paragraphs, including an introduction, an overview, and two body paragraphs dedicated to contrasting country groupings. Cohesive devices such as 'Overall', 'On the other hand', 'In contrast', and 'finally' are used to guide the reader through the data smoothly. Paragraphing is used appropriately, and there is a clear logical progression from the general overview into specific group comparisons. Although some referencing could be slightly tighter, the overall structure supports a coherent reading experience, comfortably earning a Band 7.0.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

The student demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary for the task, successfully attempting less common lexical items such as 'escalated', 'fluctuated', 'exhausts', and 'gradually'. However, there are some noticeable inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as 'carbondioxide release' (spelled 'carbondioxide' and slightly awkward collocation), 'CO2 fumes' (fumes is typically used for vehicle exhaust or smoke, not national emissions), and 'Portugese' (misspelled). Additionally, 'resspectively' contains a spelling error. These minor errors prevent the lexical score from reaching a higher band, placing it firmly at Band 6.0.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

The writer uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, incorporating participial phrases and subordinate clauses effectively (e.g., 'Emissions from Swedish people showed a maximum release...', 'Italians starting of with just over...'). There are some grammatical and punctuation errors, including spelling slips ('dramaticallly', 'anf') and minor prepositional or word-form inaccuracies ('Italians starting of' instead of 'starting off', 'lowest 1 metric tonnes'). However, these errors do not impede communication and the majority of sentences are clear and comprehensible, justifying a Band 6.5.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.