Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.5 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-10-10

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 4.5)

The given graph shows us information about carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the UK, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. Lets talk about below.

A Cursory graph glance at the graph is adequate enough to show that the average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in metric tonnes is given by numbers and years of 1967 to 2007. The United kingdom was peak on 1967 on 11 % and in 2007 is decrease as 7 %. and Sweden was rose in 7% And again increase at the 10% in 2007 it was down at 5%.

on the other hand Italy in 1967 was 4% and we saw that ,it was rose in 2007 as 7%. however Portugal are very decrease at the number of 1% in 1967 and it is climbed in 2007 at 5 %.

Overview this graph show the CO2 are increase in Portugal and Italy and UK and Sweden are falled.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response4.0
Coherence and Cohesion4.5
Lexical Resource4.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy4.5
Overall4.5

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.0

You identify the topic and mention all four countries, with a broad attempt to describe their trends. However, several key details are inaccurate: the UK falls from about 11 to 8.7 tonnes, not 7%; Sweden peaks around 10.3 in 1977 before declining, rather than rising to 10 in 2007; and Italy levels off at about 7.6 after rising, rather than simply reaching 7. The final overview also incorrectly says the UK and Sweden both fell, since the UK declines throughout but Sweden first rises. The response is 148 words, two short of the required minimum, and the shortfall limits the detail available. Report the main trends accurately and include a clear overview supported by comparisons.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5

There is a basic attempt to organise the response: an introduction is followed by descriptions of the countries and a concluding overview. The contrast marker “on the other hand” also signals a shift to Italy and Portugal. However, the progression is difficult to follow because the overview comes last and repeats or contradicts earlier claims, while the country comparisons are not clearly grouped. Phrases such as “Lets talk about below” and “A Cursory graph glance” do not help connect the information. Use a clear sequence—introduction, overview, then grouped details—and link comparisons directly, for example, contrasting the UK’s gradual decline with Italy’s rise.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

The response uses some relevant topic vocabulary, including “emissions,” “per person,” “increase,” and “decrease,” so the general subject is recognisable. However, the range is basic and repetitive, and several choices or combinations are unnatural: “A Cursory graph glance,” “was peak,” “was rose,” and “are falled.” The repeated use of “in 2007” and “at the number of” also makes the description less precise. Use standard graph language such as “peaked at,” “rose to,” “declined to,” and “remained stable.” Be careful to describe the unit as metric tonnes, not percentages, since the graph does not show percentages.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

You attempt both simple statements and longer sentences, and the reader can usually identify which countries you are discussing. However, control of sentence structure and verb forms is inconsistent. Examples include “Lets talk about below,” “The United kingdom was peak,” “Sweden was rose,” and “Portugal are very decrease.” These need more accurate forms, such as “The UK peaked at…” and “Portugal increased…” There are also problems with articles, agreement, and punctuation, including the run-on sequence “in 2007 is decrease as 7 %. and Sweden…” and inconsistent capitalisation. Build accurate simple sentences first, then add a few controlled comparisons using “while” or “whereas.”

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.