Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-10-12

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Introduction:

the provided line graph illustrates flauctuations in average carbon dioxide emissions per person through out [redacted phone] concentrating primarily on united kingdom,sweden,italy and portugal the structure to design how the data evolved chronologycally.

overview:

Broadly speaking the united kingdom and sweden followed a distinct downword trajactery where as the italy and portugal headed in reverce direction the most striking pattern is that while emission the uk and sweden droped significantily over time,the italy and portugal experienced steady increases converinging near the same level by 2007.

Main Body:

the united kingdom were stand in 1967 at around 11 metric tonnes but they were fall at 2007.while the sweden were stand in 1967 at around 8.3 metric tonnes at ones time in 1977 they were rise at 1977 on the other hand the italy were stand in 1967 at around 4.1 metric tonnes but they were extremily rise at 6.8 metric tonnes in 2007 while the portugal were stand at around 1.0 metric tonnesin 1967 but they were extremily rise 5.3 metric tonnes at 2007.

Conculsion:

the final result of this line graph the united kingdom and sweden were drooped significantily while the italy and portugal were rise significantily at 2007

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You identify the main contrast accurately: emissions in the UK and Sweden generally declined, while Italy and Portugal rose, and you note that the latter countries converged by 2007. However, the report only partly develops the graph’s key details. The UK’s fall is mentioned without its approximate ending figure, and the Sweden account does not clearly report its peak in 1977 or subsequent decline. The statement that Italy reached 6.8 tonnes in 2007 is inaccurate: it was about 7.6, and it had levelled off after rising to that point by 1997. Your overview is relevant, but the body needs clearer, more accurate comparisons across the period to make the summary complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has recognisable sections for an introduction, overview and details, and the overview gives the reader a useful broad direction for the four lines. This provides some organisation. However, the body does not progress clearly through the data: it moves between countries within a long, run-on sentence, and the Sweden figures are difficult to follow. Connectors such as “but,” “while” and “on the other hand” are repeated or used where the relationship is unclear. The separate conclusion also repeats the overview rather than adding information. Organise the body into clearer comparisons—for example, one paragraph for the declining countries and one for the rising countries—and use precise links between sentences.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some task-relevant vocabulary, including “emissions,” “metric tonnes,” “trajactery” (trajectory) and “converinging” (converging), and phrases such as “steady increases” help communicate the overall trends. However, spelling errors are frequent, including “flauctuations,” “downword,” “droped” and “significantily,” and several expressions are not natural for describing a graph, such as “were stand” and “extremily rise.” These choices sometimes make the intended meaning harder to understand. Build a reliable set of trend verbs and collocations, such as “stood at,” “rose to,” “declined to” and “remained stable,” and check spelling carefully before submitting.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

There is an attempt to use longer sentences and contrast clauses, particularly in the overview and the body, but the structures are often faulty and the response relies heavily on simple past forms. Examples include “the united kingdom were stand” and “they were fall,” where the verb forms and agreement are incorrect. Missing or misplaced punctuation also creates run-on sentences, especially in the main body, while articles and sentence openings are inconsistently handled. These errors can make relationships between events unclear. Practise forming accurate trend sentences in the past simple—such as “UK emissions stood at about 11 tonnes and then fell”—before combining them with clauses using “while” or “whereas.”

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.