Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-10-19

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The given line graphs illustrates the information regarding the burns carbon dioxide emission a person ahead in the four countries ( England,sweden, Italy and Portugal ) during 1967 to 2007. The unit is measure in metric tonnes.

Overall, it is clear that, the consumption of carbon emissions had emmensly burn by united kingdom, whereas portugal made the lowest consumption of emissions nations all over the years.

To begin, portugal become lowest use of carbon emissions in 1967 at approximately 1 metric tonne, however in the end of the year it increase dramatically nearly 6 metric tonnes. Moreover, people of Sweden burns emissions in the beginning had extreme at over 8 metric tonnes and then after a decade it rise over 10 MT but at the end it drop dramatically at around 5 metric tonnes.

Secondly, In united kingdom, people burns highest rate of emissions nearly 11 Metric tonnes in 1967 and there had little falls see after 50 years. Although, in Italy,in 1967 people burns emissions 4 metric tonnes and in 2007 at under 8 metric tonnes, respectively.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You identify the overall contrast between the UK’s highest emissions and Portugal’s lowest starting point, and you report the broad direction of change for all four countries. The figures you give are generally consistent with the graph: Portugal rises from about 1 tonne, Sweden peaks above 10 before declining, and UK emissions fall from around 11. However, the overview is not fully accurate: Portugal does not remain the lowest throughout, since it reaches roughly the same level as Sweden by 2007. The account also misses important comparisons, especially Italy’s steady rise and its overtaking of Sweden and then the UK’s position relative to Italy. Develop these key changes more clearly and avoid describing emissions as “consumption.”

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, an overview, and two detail paragraphs. Sequencing phrases such as “To begin” and “Secondly” help signal movement through the data, and the reader can follow the broad country-by-country account. However, the organisation is not always effective for comparison: Portugal and Sweden are grouped together, while the UK and Italy are discussed separately, without clearly drawing out how their trends relate. Some linking is mechanical, and “Although” introduces a clause that is not completed as a contrast. The overview also repeats the UK/Portugal contrast rather than summarising the main pattern across all four countries. Grouping countries by rising and falling trends would make progression and comparisons clearer.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some task-relevant vocabulary, including “metric tonnes,” “approximately,” “dramatically,” and “falls,” so the main subject is usually identifiable. However, word choice and collocation are often inaccurate or unnatural, sometimes making the meaning difficult to interpret. For example, “burn carbon dioxide emission,” “consumption of carbon emissions,” and “people of Sweden burns emissions” do not express the intended idea; use “CO₂ emissions per person” or “emissions rose/fell” instead. “Emmensly” is also misspelled, and “England” is not the chart’s label for the United Kingdom. Aim for a smaller set of precise trend verbs and comparison phrases rather than forcing unusual expressions.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a contrast with “however” and a clause beginning “Although.” The overall meaning can generally be recovered, but errors in sentence construction and basic grammar are frequent enough to affect clarity. Examples include “The given line graphs illustrates,” where the subject and verb do not agree, and “it increase dramatically,” where the verb form is incorrect. In “there had little falls see after 50 years,” the tense and clause structure are unclear. Articles, punctuation, and capitalisation are also inconsistent, as in “in Italy,in 1967.” Practise accurate past-tense reporting and build comparisons with complete, controlled clauses before adding more complex structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.