Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-10-27
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
The graph shows average carbon dioxide (Co2) emissions per person in the united Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal . Co2 emissions in metric tonnes are 0 to 12 between 1967 - 2007
firstly, this graph shows carbon dioxide (Co2) emissions per person in the united kingdom, sweden, italy, and portugal . Co2 emissions in metric tonnes information given in this graph . United kingdom Co2 emissions in metric tonnes are between 10 and 12 in 1967 then this point are decrease day by day and point that between 8 and 10 in 2007 . Sweden Co2 matric tonnes are between 10 and 12 in 1967 then this ratio is between 4 and 6 in 2007 . Italy emissions in matric tonnes are between almost 4 then this point increase point then between 6 and 8 in 2007. Portugal Co2 emissions in matric tonnes are between 0 and 2 then number is increase day by day and point that 4between 4 and 6 in 2007 .
overall, United kingdom Co2 emissions in metric tonnes are decrease and Portugal metric tonnes are increase.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 4.5 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5
You identify the four countries and report the broad direction of change for the UK and Portugal, with approximate starting and ending ranges that generally match the graph. However, the overview is incomplete: it does not mention that the UK remained the highest emitter, or that Sweden rose to a peak in 1977 before declining. Italy’s steady rise and its levelling off at the end are also not clearly described. The statement that emissions changed “day by day” is not supported by a graph showing only five years, and the figures are mostly given as broad ranges rather than useful comparisons. To strengthen the response, select the main turning points and compare the countries’ positions at the beginning and end.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0
There is some organisation: the response begins with an introduction, gives country-by-country information, and ends with an overall statement. However, the progression is repetitive and the overview comes only after the details. The opening description is repeated in the next paragraph, while repeated patterns such as “then this point” make the account difficult to follow. Connections between trends are limited, so the reader does not get a clear comparison of the countries. Use a concise introduction, a separate overview, and then group related trends—for example, the declining UK and Sweden figures alongside the rising Italian and Portuguese figures. More precise linking and reference would make the sequence clearer.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
The response uses relevant basic terms such as “emissions,” “increase,” and “decrease,” and the country names make the subject clear. However, vocabulary is limited and repeated, particularly “Co2 emissions in metric tonnes” and “this point.” Some word combinations are unnatural or unclear, including “this ratio” for an emissions figure and “increase point.” Spelling and presentation also need attention: “matric” appears instead of “metric,” and “Co2” should be written as “CO₂.” Build a more precise range for describing trends and comparisons, such as “rose,” “fell,” “peaked,” “remained stable,” and “overtook,” while avoiding repeated wording.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5
Most sentences rely on simple patterns, and attempts to describe change often contain errors that make the relationships between figures unclear. For example, “then this point are decrease” has incorrect verb form and agreement, while “this ratio is between 4 and 6 in 2007” does not form a clear grammatical description of the trend. Articles, capitalisation, and punctuation are also inconsistent, as in “the united kingdom” and the spaces before full stops. Use straightforward, complete sentences with a clear subject and verb: “UK emissions decreased from about 10.8 tonnes in 1967 to 8.7 in 2007.” Practise past-tense verbs and sentence boundaries before attempting longer structures.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
