Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-07-26

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

The pie charts illustrate the proportions of British learners at one university in England who were able to speak languages other than English in 2000 and 2010. The units are given in percentages.

Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that No other language accounted for the highest percentage in both years, while German only recorded the lowest figure

.

To begin with, it is evident that no other language accounted for 30% of the total in 2000, whereas it was 10 percentage points higher than Spanish only, which occupied 20%. Furthermore, another language in both years had the narrowest gap, at 15% and 20%. Additionally, German only and Two other languages in 2000 and 2010 were broadly similar, representing 10% and 10% respectively.

By contrast, no other language stood at 35% in 2010, while it was less than 15 percentage points another language, which occupied 20%. Moreover, the largest disparity can be observed between no other language in 2010 and German only in 2000, represented 10% and 35%. it is worth highlighting that Another language in 2000 was half of Spanish only 2010, the figures were 10% and 20% .

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The response covers the main features of the charts and makes relevant comparisons. You successfully identified the highest and lowest categories and noted changes over time. However, the analysis is sometimes confusing due to imprecise phrasing, such as 'no other language accounted for 30%'. It is unclear if this refers to students who spoke no other language or a specific category. Additionally, some comparisons are mathematically awkward, such as 'it was less than 15 percentage points another language'. To improve, ensure that the labels for the categories are clearly defined and that the mathematical relationships between the data points are described with greater clarity and precision.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The essay is organised into logical paragraphs, and there is a clear introduction and an overview. You use some cohesive devices like 'To begin with', 'Furthermore', and 'By contrast' to link ideas. However, the progression of information within the body paragraphs is sometimes disjointed. The referencing is occasionally unclear, making it difficult for the reader to follow which data point is being compared to another. For example, the sentence 'it is worth highlighting that Another language in 2000 was half of Spanish only 2010' is grammatically and logically strained, which hinders the flow of information.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.5

You demonstrate an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, using terms like 'proportions', 'disparity', and 'recorded'. However, there is a lack of precision in your word choices, particularly when referring to the chart categories. Phrases like 'German only' and 'no other language' are repeated frequently, which makes the writing feel somewhat repetitive. There are also minor errors in collocation, such as 'it was less than 15 percentage points another language', which slightly obscures the intended meaning. Expanding your range of reporting verbs and comparative structures would help elevate your score.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.5

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. While the meaning is generally clear, there are several grammatical errors that affect the accuracy of your writing. For instance, 'it was 10 percentage points higher than Spanish only, which occupied 20%' is slightly awkward, and 'represented 10% and 35%' lacks a proper subject. There are also issues with punctuation and sentence fragments, such as starting a sentence with 'it is worth highlighting' without proper capitalization. To reach a higher band, focus on ensuring that your complex sentences are error-free and that your subject-verb agreement is consistent throughout the response.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.