Band 7.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 7.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-08-02

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 7.0)

The pie charts compare the percentage of British students able to speak languages other than English between 2000 and 2010.

Overall, it can be clearly seen that while the number of students who were able to speak Spanish and French decreased throughout the period ,students speaking other languages and no other language increased. However, the proportion for German speaking students remained unchanged.

In 2000, No other language had the largest proportion of students accounted for 30% of total followed by Spanish at 20%. Students speak French only and another language represented each 15% while only 10% students were able to speak German and two other language.

By contrast, in 2010 percentage of students able to speak no other language and another language both increased by 5%, accounting for 35% and 20% of total students respectively. The proportion of students who could speak in Spanish, French decreased to 10% each. However, the percentage of German speaking students remained unchanged at 10%.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response7.0
Coherence and Cohesion7.5
Lexical Resource6.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy6.5
Overall7.0

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 7.0

The response covers all requirements of the task. You have successfully identified the main trends and provided data comparisons between 2000 and 2010. The overview is clear and highlights the key shifts in the data. However, there is a minor inaccuracy in the data reporting: you stated that the proportion of students who could speak 'two other languages' was 10% in 2000, but the chart indicates this figure was 20%. Additionally, the description of the 2010 data could be more precise regarding the 'two other languages' category. Overall, the response is well-structured and addresses the prompt effectively.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 7.5

The essay is logically organized with a clear introduction, overview, and body paragraphs. You use cohesive devices such as 'Overall', 'In 2000', and 'By contrast' to guide the reader through the information. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate the two years. However, some transitions are slightly mechanical, and the referencing could be smoother. For example, the sentence 'Students speak French only and another language represented each 15%' is a bit clunky. Improving the flow between sentences would help elevate the score in this criterion.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.5

You demonstrate an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, using terms like 'proportion', 'accounted for', and 'respectively'. There are some minor errors in word choice and phrasing, such as 'Students speak French only' instead of 'Students speaking French only'. While the vocabulary is sufficient to convey the meaning clearly, it lacks the variety and precision required for a higher band. To improve, try to incorporate more varied reporting verbs and synonyms for 'increased' or 'decreased' to avoid repetition.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.5

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. There are several grammatical errors, such as missing articles ('in Spanish', 'accounted for 30% of total') and awkward phrasing ('No other language had the largest proportion of students accounted for 30%'). Punctuation is generally functional, but there are some spacing issues after commas. While these errors do not impede communication, they occur frequently enough to prevent a higher score. Focusing on subject-verb agreement and article usage will significantly improve your accuracy.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.