Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-08-03
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
The charts
The students of one university in England
Presents
The chart delivers information regarding
language of the British students at one university
who can speak other language along
with english in 2000 and 2010
Overall, it can be seen that, during 2000, The spanish
and french were spoken more in comparision
to 2010 at a university in England
While, Two other language, Another language and
No other language's ratio has been increased
in 2010 theen 2000. No cheenge in the german
speaker's ration during both year 2000 as well as
2010.
The spanish and french language were spoken
by 20% and 15% respectively in 2000, which
was decreased in 2010 by 10% and 5%
respectively. The German speaker remained
same in both yeer 2000 and 2010 with 10%
of a university in England.
The ration of only English speaker was
increased by 35% in 2010, which was 30%
in 2000 at a university in England. Two languages
were also rose with 15% in
2010 in compersion 2000 with 10% among
the brutish students. Bilingual students, who
can speak another language with English also
gained with 20% in 2010, which were 15% in
2000 at a university in England
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5
The response covers the main features of the charts, including the trends for different language groups between 2000 and 2010. However, the presentation is somewhat disjointed, and the initial summary is fragmented into bullet-like phrases rather than coherent sentences. While the key data points are identified, the comparison between the two years is occasionally confusing due to inaccurate phrasing, such as stating that the ratio of 'no other language' increased when the data shows a specific shift. The overview is present but lacks the necessary polish to clearly highlight the most significant trends, such as the decline in French and Spanish speakers versus the rise in bilingualism.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.0
The essay is divided into paragraphs, but the internal structure is weak. The opening section is particularly problematic, consisting of fragmented lines rather than a cohesive introduction. Cohesive devices are used, such as 'Overall' and 'While', but they are often applied incorrectly or in a way that disrupts the flow of ideas. For example, the transition 'While, Two other language...' is grammatically and logically awkward. The progression of information is repetitive, with the phrase 'at a university in England' appearing at the end of almost every sentence, which makes the writing feel mechanical and lacks variety in referencing.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.0
The vocabulary is limited and repetitive. There are frequent spelling errors, such as 'comparision', 'theen', 'cheenge', 'ration', 'yeer', and 'compersion'. The student relies heavily on basic descriptors like 'increased' and 'decreased'. While the student attempts to use terms like 'bilingual', the overall range is insufficient to convey the information with precision. The misuse of words like 'ration' (likely meaning 'ratio' or 'proportion') and the awkward phrasing of the categories indicate a need for a broader and more accurate range of vocabulary to describe statistical trends effectively.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0
The response contains frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede clarity. There are consistent issues with subject-verb agreement (e.g., 'The spanish and french language were spoken... which was decreased') and article usage. Sentence structures are mostly simple, and attempts at complex sentences are often marred by errors in punctuation and word order. For instance, 'Two languages were also rose with 15%' is grammatically incorrect. The frequent misuse of prepositions and tense consistency makes the text difficult to follow. A greater focus on basic sentence construction and proofreading for common errors is necessary.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
