Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-08-15
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
The chats provides the information about the proportions of British students able to speak languages other than English at one university in England, in 2000 and 2010.
Overall, in 2000, maximum students was not speak no other language and less percentage of students speak german and two other language. By 2010, maximum percentage of british students not able to speak no other language.
To begin with, in 2000, maximum 30% of students was not spoken any other languages. there was 20% of students spoken spanish in university. Moreover, 15% of students was spoken french and another language. In this year 10% of british students able to spoken german and two other languages. By 2010, the no other languages percentage increases 5% than 2000. it was around 35%. in this year, british students was spoken another and two other languages approximately 20% and 15%, respectively. Furthermore, 10% of students was spoken spanish, french and german languages. this value decreases in this years.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 4.5 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0
The response covers the main features of the charts, identifying the trends for both 2000 and 2010. However, the analysis is somewhat superficial and contains inaccuracies in data interpretation. For instance, the statement 'maximum percentage of british students not able to speak no other language' is confusing and grammatically flawed, making it difficult to follow the comparison. While the key features are selected, the lack of precision in describing the data (e.g., 'another and two other languages') hinders the clarity of the report. To reach a higher band, you should ensure that the data is reported accurately and that the comparisons between the two years are clearly articulated without ambiguity.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5
The essay is organised into paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the structure. However, the use of cohesive devices is often mechanical or inaccurate. Phrases like 'To begin with' and 'Moreover' are used, but the logical flow between sentences is frequently disrupted by grammatical errors. The referencing is sometimes unclear, particularly when discussing the categories of languages. The progression of ideas is present but lacks the sophistication required for higher bands. Improving the variety and accuracy of linking words will help create a smoother, more logical flow throughout the response.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.0
The vocabulary is limited and repetitive, relying heavily on basic phrasing such as 'maximum percentage' and 'students was spoken'. There is a lack of variety in reporting verbs and descriptive language. Errors in word choice, such as 'maximum students was not speak no other language', impede the clarity of the message. To improve, you should focus on using a wider range of vocabulary to describe trends, such as 'proportion', 'fluctuated', 'remained stable', or 'experienced a decline'. Currently, the lexical range is just adequate for the task but lacks the precision needed for a higher score.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 4.5
The response contains frequent grammatical errors that often impede communication. There are consistent issues with subject-verb agreement (e.g., 'students was spoken', 'chats provides') and tense usage. The sentence structures are mostly simple, and attempts at more complex sentences are often faulty, such as the double negative 'not able to speak no other language'. Punctuation is also inconsistent, with missing capital letters at the start of sentences. To achieve a higher band, you must focus on basic sentence construction, ensuring that subjects and verbs agree and that tenses are used consistently throughout the report.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.