Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-09-03

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

Two pie charts illustrate the percentage of British university students in English who were proficient in additional language other than English in 2000 and 2010.

Overall, it is evident that the percentage of no other language recorded the highest figure in both years, while German only and two other languages experienced the lowest figure in 2000, and French, German and Spanish only showed the least proportion in 2010.

In 2000, the proportion of no other language had the largest share at 30%, compared with 20% in Spanish only. French and Another language had reportedly similar share at 15%. Two Other Languages and German only accounted for the smallest proportion both with 10%.

In terms of 2010, the percentage of No Other Language had increased from 30% in 2000 to 35% in 2010, this was followed by Another Language at 20%. The third highest position was Two Other Languages with 15%. Spanish, French and German Only accounted for 10%, 10% and 10, respectively.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.5
Coherence and Cohesion6.5
Lexical Resource6.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy6.0
Overall6.5

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

You have successfully identified the main features of the charts and provided a clear overview. You accurately selected and reported the data for both 2000 and 2010, making relevant comparisons such as the increase in the 'No Other Language' category. However, the response could be improved by grouping the data more effectively to highlight trends rather than listing figures chronologically. For instance, you could have contrasted the categories that increased with those that decreased. Overall, the task is well-addressed, and the key information is clearly presented.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The response is logically organized with a clear introduction, overview, and two body paragraphs. You use cohesive devices such as 'In terms of', 'compared with', and 'this was followed by' to link ideas effectively. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate the two time periods. While the flow is generally smooth, some transitions between sentences could be more varied to avoid a slightly mechanical feel. Overall, the information is presented in a coherent manner that is easy to follow.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

You demonstrate an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, using terms like 'proficient', 'proportion', and 'accounted for' correctly. There is some repetition of basic phrases like 'highest figure' and 'lowest figure'. To reach a higher band, try to incorporate more varied synonyms for 'increase' or 'decrease' and use more precise collocations. For example, instead of 'recorded the highest figure', you could use 'represented the most significant proportion'. The vocabulary used is accurate and does not impede communication.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, which is appropriate for this task. There are some minor grammatical slips, such as 'in English' instead of 'in England' and 'additional language other than' which should be 'an additional language'. Additionally, the phrase '10, respectively' is missing the percentage sign. Despite these minor errors, your control of grammar is generally good, and the meaning is always clear. The punctuation is mostly accurate, and the sentence structures are sufficiently varied to maintain interest.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.