Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-11-05

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.

To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The waste from homes are not properly getting recycled according to some people. They demand government should involve and take legal steps to increase recycling. In my view, some wastes are actually dangerous and some are not that much harmful. Government should impose legal steps to dispose dangerous wastes and should try to inspire people to recycle non-dangerous wastes too.

In current world, there are a lot of materials and goods which can be detrimental to environment when they become disposable. In fact, in many cases they can be life threatening. For example: car battery are widely used all over the world. When the lifespan of the battery expires, people usually throw them to the bin. With extreme heat, these batteries can explode and harm nearby people and assets. Government should take necessary actions to make sure, user disposes these batteries to nearby recyling center regularly.

Some wastes are not that much harmful but still can create problems. For example: rather than throwing bio-waste in the garbage pit, they can be reused as fertilizer in gardens. In addition, other types of waste like soda can, glass bottle, plastic bottle are not mixable to the ground and they need to be sent to the recyling facility. Government should promote awareness about these wastes and should try to inspire people to dispose wastes to the recycling bin in sorted order. From my point of view, awareness is a prominent way to make people understand the necessity of recycling.

In conclusion, government should apply strict rules to dispose dangerous and harmul wastes in a proper manner. Additionally, they should launch adequate campaigns to raise awareness to dispose or reuse other wastes in such a way that there is no harm come to the environment.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You present a clear position: laws should address dangerous waste, while awareness can encourage recycling of other materials. This responds to the question and is supported with relevant examples, particularly the battery example and the reuse of bio-waste as fertilizer. However, the distinction between dangerous and non-dangerous waste is not fully explained as a basis for deciding when laws are needed. The claim that batteries may explode is also not developed with evidence or a clear explanation of how regulation would ensure safe disposal. To strengthen the response, explain whether legal requirements should apply more broadly—for example, through household sorting rules or penalties—and develop the likely benefits and limitations of your approach.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a coherent overall structure: an introduction states your view, two body paragraphs discuss different types of waste, and the conclusion restates your recommendation. Paragraphing helps the reader follow the main distinction, and transitions such as “In addition” and “In conclusion” make the sequence clear. Some connections are less precise or feel mechanical, however. The shift from the battery example to the general recommendation is abrupt, and “Some wastes are not that much harmful” does not clearly signal how this paragraph relates to the question of legal requirements. References such as “they” in the bio-waste example could also be clearer. Use topic sentences that directly connect each example to your position, and vary linking methods rather than relying mainly on explicit transitions.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a relevant range of vocabulary, including “detrimental to environment,” “lifespan,” “fertilizer,” and “raise awareness,” which helps communicate the topic. There are also attempts at more formal expressions, such as “necessary actions” and “strict rules.” However, several word choices and collocations are inaccurate or unnatural, including “getting recycled,” “disposable” for materials that are discarded, “recycling center regularly,” and “sorted order.” Spelling errors such as “recyling” and “harmul” also reduce accuracy. Aim for more precise environmental vocabulary and check common word partnerships; for example, say “be recycled,” “hazardous waste,” and “sort waste before disposal.” This would make your meaning more natural and exact.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You use a mix of simple and more complex sentence forms, including conditional and subordinate clauses such as “When the lifespan of the battery expires” and “rather than throwing bio-waste in the garbage pit.” Most ideas remain understandable, but some grammatical errors recur. For example, “The waste from homes are” has subject–verb disagreement, while “Government should involve” and “make sure, user disposes” have problems with articles and sentence construction. In the conclusion, “there is no harm come to the environment” is not grammatically formed. Review agreement, articles, and verb patterns, and proofread punctuation around introductory phrases. More accurate control of these structures would make the argument easier to read.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.