Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-11-09

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.

To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

It is considered by some people argue that low aomunt of the waste from homes is recycled. However, the community said the only process involved to increase recycling is for goverments to make it a legal necessity. I strongly believe that laws are needed to make overall community responsible to recycle their waste.

Firstly, In my opinion i believe that government makes a proper law for recycling the waste so all the resident will proper recycle their waste. As we can see all the people through garbage anywhere such as in the roads,rivers and parks if the government take legal action for the recycling of waste no one spread any kinds of the waste to the roads and the other areas. To some extent, the government makes a strict law for littering anywhere should pay a fine. For instance, if everyone follow the law they make their environment neat and clean and no one is sick and diseases will not spread. In addition, most of the animals were die because they eat the waste so if everyone follow this law which the government made we can save many lives of the animals as well as our country.

Secondly, if the government do not make the law for recycyling of the products such as bottles, clothes and other wastes all the people through outside the waste and this cause the blockage of the pipes and we can see garbage everywhere because in the homes it is difficult to recycled the materials. Furthermore, the government provides the proper dustbin in all the areas where people litter bottles in one sides and papers on the other side so this is the easiest way to recycle the products.

To sum up, law is very important for recycling because everyone should follow the law and do not spread the waste everywhere so we can safe the whole community from different kinds of diseases and makes our environment clean.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.5
Coherence and Cohesion6.0
Lexical Resource5.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.5

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

Your position is clear: you strongly support laws to increase recycling, and you give relevant reasons involving litter, public health, blocked pipes and harm to animals. The example of fines also helps explain how enforcement might work. However, the response addresses the question only partly because it focuses largely on littering and keeping places clean, rather than explaining how laws would specifically increase the recycling of household waste. The point about providing separate bins is relevant but is not clearly connected to legal requirements, and several claims—such as everyone following the law—are asserted rather than developed. Explain what households would be legally required to do and why this would be more effective than voluntary measures, then support that reasoning with a specific example.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs signalled by “Firstly” and “Secondly,” and a concluding summary. The ideas are generally grouped by topic, and examples follow the points they are intended to support. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes difficult to follow: the first body paragraph moves from littering to fines, disease and animal deaths without clearly showing how each point relates to recycling. Linking phrases such as “In addition” and “Furthermore” are used, but some connections feel mechanical, and references such as “this law” are not always precise. To improve, organise each paragraph around one main reason, explain the link between sentences, and use clearer references to the specific policy or waste being discussed.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use a basic range of topic-related vocabulary, including “recycling,” “legal action,” “fine,” “blockage” and “environment.” These terms make your general meaning understandable. However, vocabulary is limited and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate or repetitive, which sometimes makes the message less clear. For example, “the only process involved” is an awkward way to describe a proposed solution, while “through garbage” appears where a verb meaning to discard is needed. “Legal necessity” also does not express the idea as naturally as “legal requirement.” Spelling errors such as “aomunt,” “goverments” and “recycyling” further weaken control. Build a more precise set of phrases for household sorting, collection and compliance, and check spelling carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and complex sentences, including conditional structures such as “if everyone follow the law” and clauses beginning with “because” and “where.” This shows an effort to express causes and consequences, but control is inconsistent, and errors often make sentences awkward or difficult to interpret. Examples include “government makes a proper law,” “all the resident will proper recycle,” and “most of the animals were die”; these involve problems with verb forms, agreement and sentence construction. Capitalisation and punctuation are also inconsistent, as in “Firstly, In my opinion i believe” and the missing space after commas. Practise accurate subject–verb agreement, verb forms after modal verbs, and simpler sentence boundaries before adding more complex clauses.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.