Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-11-09

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.

To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

A significant number of individuals believe that not enough of household waste is being recycled from homes and the only effective way to encourage people to increase recycling is to make it a legal requirement by government. I partly agree with this view as implementing stricter laws will encourage people to recycle more, but at the same time public awareness and more recycling facilities should be availaible as they are equally important.

It could be argued that, government should introduce stricter laws, penalties and fines to encourage more people to recycle waste from their respective houses. This is particularly important as more people will consider this issue as serious and will recycle more of their insufficient household waste in order to avoid fines or penalties. As a result, the environment will benefitted and individuals will comply with the rules.

However, i would argue that public awareness should be provided in order to stop people from avoiding this problem. There should be campaigns and sessions to provide the knowledge and importance of recycling wastes from all the households. As a result, more people will be aware of this problem and follow all the necessary advice provided during the awareness sessions.

Another most important factor is providing necessary facilities in order to recycle the household waste. Separate bins should be provided in all places with the name specifying which waste to be thrown in the respective bins.This can lead to proper utilisation of bins and all the unidentified waste will be thrown away from the houses, which results in a more sustainable environment.

In conclusion, I partly agree that in order to recycle household waste, implementing a law alone is not sufficient, individuals should be publicly aware and necessary facilites should be provided in order to encourage more individuals to recycle their unwanted household waste.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you partly agree that laws can increase recycling, while arguing that awareness and facilities are also needed. You address the main parts of the question and give relevant reasons, including fines as an incentive and separate bins as practical support. However, the discussion of laws is more developed than the other points, and some claims remain general. For example, you say campaigns will make people follow advice, but do not explain what behaviour they would change or give a concrete example. The facilities paragraph also needs to connect more directly to whether laws are necessary. Develop each reason with a specific illustration and explain how it supports your degree of agreement.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a coherent overall arrangement: an introduction states your view, three body paragraphs present laws, awareness and facilities, and the conclusion restates your position. Linking phrases such as “As a result” and “However” help show relationships between ideas, and the paragraphing is appropriate. To make the progression more convincing, ensure each paragraph develops one clear point and links it explicitly to the question of whether laws are needed. Some connections are mechanical or unclear: “Another most important factor” is an awkward transition, while “which results in a more sustainable environment” does not clearly identify what “which” refers to. Use more precise referencing and vary the way you connect cause, example and conclusion.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “household waste,” “stricter laws,” “penalties,” “public awareness,” and “sustainable environment.” These choices make the subject clear, and you attempt more formal expressions such as “implementing” and “comply.” Some wording is repetitive or imprecise, however: “waste” and “recycle” recur frequently, and “unidentified waste” does not clearly describe the waste that remains unsorted. There are also spelling errors, including “availiable” and “facilites,” and some unnatural combinations such as “publicly aware.” Aim for more precise collocations and vary repeated terms—for example, refer to sorting household rubbish or separating recyclable materials where appropriate.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including clauses introduced by “as,” “in order to” and “which,” and your meaning is generally clear. Some grammatical errors remain. For example, “the environment will benefitted” needs the correct passive form, “will benefit” or “will be benefited”; “government should introduce” needs an article or plural form; and “i would argue” requires a capital letter. There are also punctuation and sentence-boundary issues, such as the missing space after “bins.” in “bins.This,” and the comma after “argued that.” Review verb forms, articles and punctuation, then check that longer sentences have clear subjects and references.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.