Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-11-13
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
As nowadays some individual claim about the waste form home are not being recycled much so they want government to take a stick action and make laws to fulfil this requirements. In terms of my opinion I partially agree with the statement as not everything is the responsibilities of government as a taxpayer some where its our duty also to pay off to became civic-minded individuals.
On the one hand, Contributor to the countries and waste as well, can play their role by reducing the size of waste they are making like instead of purchasing 50 Plastic bags for daily use individual should go for two cloths material bags which can be reused and washable not like plastic bags like use and throw. Citizens can help the government by separating waste into different categories, such as wet, dry, and other waste. This makes it easier for the government to collect, sort, and recycle garbage efficiently.
On the other hand, the government should take several measures to improve waste management. Firstly, it should instruct the waste management department to collect garbage twice a day, which would help address almost half of the problem. Secondly, the collected waste should be sent to separate processing facilities according to its category. For example, one facility should handle dry waste, another should process wet waste, while a third should deal with metal waste. This would make waste management and recycling more efficient. Thirdly, the government should distribute recycled products among homeless and underprivileged people. For instance, metal waste could be recycled into household utensils, while other materials could be used to manufacture essential household products. These items could then be distributed to people in need, helping them improve their living conditions while also enhancing the government's public image.
In conclusion, waste recycled is a good development for the country hence this should be done by government and citizen both. They both can play vital role in bring belter things to the world.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5
You give a partly clear position in the introduction (“I partially agree”) and conclusion, and you discuss roles for both citizens and government. The examples of separating waste and using different processing facilities are relevant. However, the question specifically asks how far laws are needed, and the essay mainly describes practical waste-management measures rather than explaining whether legal requirements would increase recycling. The position is also not fully consistent: you say citizens have a duty, but do not clarify whether voluntary action is enough or what laws should require. Develop this central argument with a specific example, such as mandatory sorting or penalties for non-compliance, and explain why it would work. Some proposals, particularly distributing recycled goods, are not clearly connected to the need for laws.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5
The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs presenting different sides, and a conclusion. The contrastive signposts “On the one hand” and “On the other hand,” followed by “Firstly,” “Secondly,” and “Thirdly,” make the sequence easy to follow. This coherent arrangement meets the lower-band expectations, and the paragraphing is generally appropriate. To make progression more convincing, ensure each paragraph directly advances the answer about legislation; the government paragraph currently moves through collection, processing, and aid distribution without linking these measures clearly to laws. Some connections are also awkward or unclear, such as “Contributor to the countries and waste as well,” and “hence this should be done by government and citizen both.” Use clearer references and transitions to show how each example supports your position.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You use relevant topic vocabulary, including “separating waste,” “processing facilities,” “recycled products,” and “underprivileged people,” and you attempt some less common expressions such as “civic-minded.” However, the range is limited by repeated use of “waste,” “government,” and “help,” while several inaccurate word choices or collocations make meaning less clear. For example, “take a stick action” does not express the intended idea, and “waste recycled is a good development” is unnatural. There are also spelling and word-form slips, including “belter” and “cloths material bags.” Aim for precise, natural phrases and check spelling; for instance, distinguish “recycling household waste” from “waste management,” and use “reusable cloth bags” for the example.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
You attempt both simple and complex sentences, including a conditional comparison (“instead of purchasing… individual should go…”) and a relative clause (“which would help address…”). The meaning is generally recoverable, but errors in sentence structure and grammatical forms are frequent enough to make some sentences difficult to process. The opening sentence has an unclear construction (“As nowadays some individual claim about…”), and the introduction contains faulty agreement and phrasing in “not everything is the responsibilities.” Other examples include “government and citizen both” and “play vital role,” where number and article forms are not controlled. Practise building complete sentences with a clear subject and verb, then check agreement, articles, and plural forms. More accurate control of these basics would make your complex ideas easier to follow.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.