Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-11-14

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.

To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Some invidual belives that, people are not recycling the waste of there home, to make this practice common goverment should implement an law and make it legal requiremnet. I totally agree that, the law should introduced.

Firstly, by that way people make it obligatery, if there is heavy fine for not recyclying waste. Many countries already proposed this law. For instance, i visited japan last year, there is a saperate recycling bin for each and every waste, such as: palstic, paper, can and other materail. By this way, it made easy for cictizen to recycle different waste and there is also cameras which moniter , whenever some one put wrong cateory waste into bin, government imposed them heavy fine. By that way citizen are forced to recycle the waste and goverment also help them into role.

Moreover, Some materail such as plastic and tin, they are biodegradale , means they can not disolve in soil for centuries. It pollute the environment also make soil un-fertizable. It is also dengerours for marine life, more than million of fishes lose there life beacuse of water pollution. Material like plastic and tin is widely used in every household, every mint million of plastic got wasted and effect earth. To save the agriculture, marine life and also earth life. It is one of the most important law government should Imposed of every country like japan for future of earth.

OVerall, In my prespective cictizen as well as government should take serious step toward recycyling the waste otherwise It will distrory earth soon.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you agree that laws should be introduced, and you give relevant reasons, including fines as a deterrent and the environmental harm caused by waste. The Japan example also helps illustrate how rules and separate bins might support recycling. However, the response develops the need for laws more fully than the question of how far laws are needed or whether other measures could also help. Some claims, such as the effect of plastic and tin on soil and marine life, are asserted rather than explained, and the final paragraph briefly adds shared responsibility without developing it. To strengthen the response, explain why legal requirements are necessary alongside practical support, such as accessible recycling facilities or public education, and make the extent of your agreement explicit throughout.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs beginning with “Firstly” and “Moreover,” and a concluding paragraph. This makes the main line of argument reasonably easy to follow. Some connections, however, are mechanical or unclear. “By that way” is repeated, and the first body paragraph moves from fines to Japan’s bins and cameras without clearly distinguishing the roles of facilities and enforcement. The second paragraph also shifts from biodegradability to pollution and then to a broad call to protect the earth. Use more precise links to show cause and effect, and organise each paragraph around one main point. Clearer references and a more focused conclusion would make the progression smoother.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some topic-relevant vocabulary, including “recycling bin,” “heavy fine,” “environment,” “marine life,” and “water pollution,” so the reader can understand the subject and your main ideas. However, the range is limited and several spelling and word-choice errors make the writing less clear or natural, such as “invidual,” “saperate,” “biodegradale,” and “un-fertizable.” Some combinations are also awkward, including “government also help them into role” and “every mint million of plastic.” Aim to learn accurate topic vocabulary and common collocations, then check spelling carefully. More precise terms for waste sorting, enforcement, and environmental consequences would help you express the argument with greater clarity and flexibility.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more extended sentence forms, and the overall meaning is usually recoverable. Some grammatical errors remain, particularly with articles, verb forms, agreement, and sentence boundaries. For example, “the law should introduced” needs a passive form (“the law should be introduced”), while “there is a saperate recycling bin” does not agree with the later plural idea of bins. The opening sentence also has an unnecessary comma after “that,” and several sentences join ideas in ways that make their relationships unclear. Practise accurate passive constructions and subject–verb agreement, and use full stops to separate complete ideas. These improvements would make your argument easier to read while preserving your attempts at complex sentences.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.