Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-07-28

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.

To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Many individuals assume that government should implement laws in order to cope with recycling issues made by general households. So, it will become much easier to get control over waste produced in a positive manner. Personally, I believe that this kind of laws can contribute to have a better access of waste that can be recycled.

On the one hand, In various part of the world awareness is spreading rapidly for conserving ecosystem by producing less of non-degradable waste. Moreover, many organisations are more engaged to make products out to material that can be disposed after use without being a hazardous threat to environment. This sort of initiatives are becoming more popular and government also contributes in a significant ways. For instance, In India authorities gives a subsidies to farmers and factories who produce this kind of products.

Nevertheless, this is not the case many people with greed as an officials does not allocate the funded money to nature conservation projects. And as a human it's our responsibility to manage waste produced by humans.

I believe that as an human it's our duty to look after our natural parks or our surrounding rather than involving authorities. However, By implement there will be strictness and less waste will be thrown in open areas.

In summary, I would concede that inventing new technology to cope with recycling related issues in future will be best outcome. Overall, I am convinced that human are totally responseble for the damage that we put to nautre

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses the prompt by discussing the role of government legislation in recycling. However, the development of ideas is inconsistent. While you mention the benefits of laws, the argument becomes somewhat contradictory in the third and fourth paragraphs, where you shift focus to individual responsibility and corruption. The position is not fully sustained throughout the essay, as the conclusion introduces a new idea (technology) rather than reinforcing the main argument. To improve, ensure each paragraph directly supports your central thesis and avoid introducing new, unrelated concepts in the conclusion.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is organised into paragraphs, but the logical progression between them is weak. Transitions such as 'Nevertheless' and 'However' are used, but they do not always connect the ideas effectively, leading to a disjointed flow. For example, the transition from discussing government subsidies to corruption is abrupt. Additionally, some sentences are repetitive, such as the references to 'human responsibility'. Using a wider range of cohesive devices and ensuring that each paragraph has a clear topic sentence would significantly improve the flow and clarity of your writing.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task but lacks the precision and variety required for a higher band. There are several instances of awkward phrasing, such as 'get control over waste' and 'contribute to have a better access'. Some words are used incorrectly, such as 'responseble' (spelling error) and 'strictness' (which is not the most natural choice in this context). To reach a higher band, focus on using more precise collocations and academic vocabulary, and ensure you check your spelling carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede readability. Issues include subject-verb agreement (e.g., 'authorities gives'), article usage (e.g., 'in a significant ways'), and awkward sentence construction (e.g., 'By implement there will be strictness'). While the meaning is generally clear, the high frequency of errors in basic grammar prevents the essay from reaching a higher band. Focus on proofreading for common errors like pluralisation and verb forms to improve your accuracy.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.