Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-07-31
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
The controversy surrounding the recycling process of waste from homes which always been a topic of discussion has now reached a fever pitch in society. I believe that people should also have to do something for recycling wastage.
Analyzing the statement, Few people believe that enough of the waste from homes is not recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it real. For some extent it is true but people should be consoled and to be aware about the danger of wastage which are recycled. Another striking factor is that, Plastic bags never become fossil for hundred of years and are the main causes of different dieses.
Probing ahead, Government should also make laws, rules and regulations. First and foremost, Government should ban plastic bags which are not recycled from homes. Categorically, People also have to stop using plastic bags because at homes peoples do not have much machines or systems to recycle them. Other wastage is recycled from homes. In addition it is pertinent to mention that other there are many other wastages which are not recycled at home. Government should also have to do something for these wastages. It is not only the responsibility of government but we also have to use such products which are good for environment.
In conclusion one can reach the gist of benefits of recycling the wastage. The environment should become clean and healthy if government can pass laws and regulations for such wastages which peoples cannot recycle them at homes.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0
The response addresses the prompt by discussing the role of government legislation in recycling. However, the development of ideas is limited. While you mention that laws are necessary, the reasoning is somewhat repetitive and lacks depth. For instance, the argument about plastic bags is introduced but not fully explored in the context of legal requirements. The position is generally clear, but the essay would benefit from more specific examples or a more structured argument regarding the balance between individual responsibility and government intervention. To improve, ensure each paragraph focuses on a distinct, well-supported point.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0
The essay is organized into paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the structure. However, the use of cohesive devices is often mechanical or slightly awkward, such as 'Probing ahead' and 'Categorically'. Some transitions between sentences are abrupt, making the flow feel disjointed. Referencing is occasionally unclear, particularly in the second paragraph where the connection between 'danger of wastage' and the recycling process is not fully articulated. Improving the variety and naturalness of linking words will help create a more cohesive argument.
Lexical Resource — Band 6.0
The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task but lacks the precision and range required for higher bands. There are several instances of awkward word choices, such as 'fever pitch', 'consoled', and 'dieses' (spelling error for diseases). The phrase 'never become fossil' is also imprecise. While you attempt to use some topic-specific vocabulary, the overall range is limited, and some expressions do not convey the intended meaning clearly. Focusing on learning collocations and more academic synonyms for common words will significantly enhance your score.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5
The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede clarity. Examples include 'which always been a topic', 'For some extent', and 'Government should also have to do something'. Subject-verb agreement and article usage are inconsistent throughout the text. While the meaning is generally understandable, the frequency of these errors prevents the essay from reaching a higher band. Focusing on basic sentence construction and proofreading for common errors like verb tense and pluralization would be beneficial.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.