Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-08-01
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.5)
Nowadays, some individuals argue that not enough of the rubish from homes is recycled. They believe that goverments should take strict legal requirement to increase recycling. I largly agree with this view point as well as this essay will discuss my opinion with relavent examples.
To begin with, people are not aware of recycling. To explain it, they do not understand the importance as well as the process of recycling waste. Additionally, dustbins are not available in their particular areas. For example, goverment provide two or three bins after send the latter to the municiple corporator but due to the lack of knowledge about reclamation, they just avoid it. Therefore, People store garbage in their home instead of through into a bin. Also, some small families have a mindset to store their rubish untill the arrival of municiple van.
Furthermore, to boost recycling, authorities should take strict action regarding to follow laws. This is because people are show laziness for their responsitbity as well as they think that it is waste of time. For that, governments should take charge from who are not recycled their litter. As a result, folks are think about it and regularly reuse waste. Moreover, social media need to telecast an advertisement related to this and shows som advantages of recycling.
To conclude, i think that to inhance reclamation governments ought to spread awarness among individuals as well as take some penalty, while media also aid in the requirement by showing advertisement to make people attentive.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 6.0 |
| Overall | 6.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5
The response addresses the prompt by discussing the necessity of legal requirements for recycling. You have a clear position, and the essay is structured to support this view. However, the development of ideas is somewhat limited. For instance, the argument regarding 'lack of knowledge' is a bit repetitive, and the suggestion that governments should 'take charge' from those who do not recycle is vague. To reach a higher band, you should provide more specific, real-world examples or deeper analysis of how legislation effectively changes public behavior, rather than just stating that people are lazy or lack awareness.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5
The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, each with a clear focus. You use basic cohesive devices such as 'To begin with', 'Furthermore', and 'To conclude' to signal transitions. However, the flow within paragraphs is sometimes mechanical, and the referencing is occasionally unclear (e.g., 'the latter' in the second paragraph is confusing). Additionally, the connection between sentences could be smoother; some ideas feel like a list of points rather than a cohesive argument. Improving the variety of linking words and ensuring that each sentence logically follows the previous one will help improve the flow.
Lexical Resource — Band 6.0
Your vocabulary is generally adequate for the task, but there are frequent spelling errors (e.g., 'rubish', 'goverments', 'largly', 'relavent', 'municiple', 'inhance', 'awarness'). These errors are noticeable and detract from the professional tone of the essay. While you attempt to use some topic-specific vocabulary like 'reclamation' and 'municiple corporator', the word choice is sometimes imprecise or unnatural. To improve, focus on mastering the spelling of common academic words and expanding your range of collocations related to environmental policy and waste management.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0
The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors throughout. Common issues include subject-verb agreement (e.g., 'folks are think', 'people are show laziness'), incorrect preposition usage ('regarding to follow'), and awkward phrasing ('take strict legal requirement'). While these errors do not completely impede communication, they occur frequently enough to impact the overall clarity. You should focus on proofreading for basic verb forms and ensuring that your sentence structures are grammatically sound before attempting more complex constructions.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.