Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-08-06
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
In this modern era , environment safe plays an important role in every person life. Some individuals believe that not sufficient of the waste from house is recycled. They say that only way to rise recycling is for authorities to make it a legal requirement In this essay I strongly agree with this statement reasons for my inclinations are articulated in the following paragraphs.
Commencing with the reasons why laws are important for every people because laws create responsibilities and accountability. To explain, many people who do not recycle any product if the laws are require or need for these. Moreover, countries should make hard rule for household recycling it can create automatic recycling rate increase .Furthermore, sometimes authorities should make fix fane or penalty automatically people recycle multiple products at their house. To cite an instance, in the UK government should start household recycle products such as study tables, dining tables, sofa sets and other products.
On the other hand , other options are much effective way to increase recycling products . First, government ought to start public awareness campaigns . To explain, if local authorities have to start these kind of awareness campaigns people also know about how they essay way to recycling items. Second, multiple schools and colleges should organize recycle products education program at these places. To cite an example, in the USA universities have to start best way to recycling products such as papers , pens, pencils, and many others.
In conclusion, there are several reasons why laws are important for recycling waste because it create responsibilities and accountability. However, there are some other way to increase recycling process such as public awareness campaigns as well as education institution organize recycling program at schools and colleges.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0
The response addresses the prompt by taking a clear position in favor of legal requirements. However, the development of ideas is somewhat superficial. While you mention that laws create accountability, the explanation is repetitive and lacks depth. The examples provided, such as the UK government regulating dining tables or sofa sets, are not logical or relevant to the context of household waste recycling, which typically focuses on packaging, paper, and plastics. To improve, ensure your supporting arguments are logically sound and directly address the practicalities of the issue rather than listing arbitrary household items.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5
The essay is organized into clear paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the structure. You use basic cohesive devices like 'Commencing with', 'Moreover', and 'In conclusion' to signal transitions. However, the flow within paragraphs is sometimes hindered by awkward phrasing and mechanical repetition of ideas. The referencing is occasionally unclear, and the logical progression between sentences is sometimes weak, particularly in the second paragraph where the link between laws and specific furniture items is disjointed. Using a wider variety of linking words and ensuring each sentence builds logically on the previous one would improve the coherence.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.0
The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task but lacks the precision and range required for a higher band. There are several instances of incorrect word choice, such as 'environment safe' instead of 'environmental safety' and 'fix fane' (likely meaning 'fixed fines'). Phrases like 'rise recycling' and 'hard rule' are imprecise. You rely on a limited set of words, and the lack of collocation awareness (e.g., 'essay way' instead of 'easy way') occasionally makes the text difficult to follow. Expanding your vocabulary to include more academic collocations and topic-specific terminology would be beneficial.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0
The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors that affect readability. Common issues include subject-verb agreement (e.g., 'laws are require'), missing articles, and incorrect word forms (e.g., 'every people' instead of 'everyone'). Punctuation is also inconsistent, with spaces missing before commas and periods. While the meaning is generally clear, these persistent errors demonstrate a lack of control over complex structures. Focusing on basic sentence construction and proofreading for subject-verb agreement would significantly improve your accuracy.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.