Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-08-20
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
In recent time a lot of waste generated may tend to cause harm to nature because of this garbage produced in houses need to be recycled. A lot of people think that not enough quantity of waste produced in the houses are recycled. And it is often believed by critics that government should make strict regulations to make people recycle more of their wastes. I firmly agree to this statement reason to my agreement are given further in this essay.
It is often believed that government should initiate laws to make people focused on recycling process. Strict law initiation can cause numerous benefits. Firstly, if national authority make rules for recycling process people will be forced to recycle their household items leading less waste dumped. To illustrate this when government makes rules, it forces people to segregate waste which in turn leads to less waste in landfills. Secondly, rules will make sure that people take recycling process seriously. Sometimes people doesn't know the concerning issues and need behind recycling process leading to unseriousness. laws and penality will make sure people follows the reusage process.
Furthermore, countries that have strict rules in recycling process have lowest rate of waste generation which is beneficial for environment. Waste generated and dumped in landfill may sometime cause harm to nature. Rules make sure that people indirectly contribute in preserving environment.
On the other hand rules only does not enforce people to recycle. Government should educate people to recycle and process involve in recycling. To illustrate programs in schools should be initiated to teach student about the process and benefits of recycling.
To conclude, in current time some people don't focus enough on recycling this can be due to lack of knowledge about the process involved and concerning effect caused by waste production. However, strict regulation may will make sure that people become more concerned and focus towards recycling. Along with laws, authority should provide understanding to local public about recycling process.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0
The response addresses the task by discussing the need for laws to promote recycling, offering relevant arguments and examples. However, while it acknowledges the issue of waste and legislation, it could better develop its points with more detailed examples and evidence. The conclusion restates the author's position but lacks a clear summary of supporting reasons. Overall, the response could be more focused and structured.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0
The essay demonstrates some coherence with clear paragraphing, but transitions between ideas could be more fluid. For example, phrases like "Firstly" and "Secondly" indicate an attempt at organization but lead to abrupt shifts. Some sentences are lengthy and lack clear connections which may disrupt flow. Overall, it needs smoother links between arguments to enhance clarity and cohesion.
Lexical Resource — Band 6.0
The lexicon used is adequate but lacks variety. Some instances of informal language, such as "not enough quantity of waste" and "not focus enough on recycling," could be improved with more precise terminology. Occasional awkward phrasing, such as 'may tend to cause harm', diminishes the academic tone. Nonetheless, vocabulary related to the topic is present, but more sophisticated word choices would greatly enhance the writing.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0
Grammatical accuracy is a concern in this response. There are several grammatical errors, including agreement issues (e.g., "people doesn't" should be "people don't") and awkward constructions (e.g., "rules only does not enforce"). While the overall meaning is understandable, frequent errors hinder clarity. Increasing attention to grammatical correctness would significantly improve the score.
Overall feedback
Your response to the task presents valid points regarding the need for stricter recycling laws. The structure of your essay is clear, with identifiable paragraphs. However, focus on enhancing your arguments with more specific examples and evidence to support your claims. Improving coherence with better transitions between ideas will make your writing flow more smoothly. Additionally, pay attention to grammatical accuracy and varied vocabulary to strengthen your academic tone. Consider proofreading for grammatical errors and refine your word choices to utilize a more sophisticated lexicon.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.