Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-09-03

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.

To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Some people believe that the claim that not enough of the waste from their homes is recycled. they tell that the only way to increased recycling is for government to make is a legal requirement .in my viewpoint yes the laws are needed to make many people recycle more their waste and reduce environment pollution.

in first reason, the laws are most important to do every thing properly. However that things is recycling ,reducing or somethings else. When the government make a strong rules then all people recycle their waste. in addition, also the environment is sanitation. therefore, that rules safe our money also .for instance, we need same thing used again then this time we made that thing again useable if that things recyclable. as a result we fulfil our needed things with saving money.

in the second reason, some people think that buy a new things is rather than used recycling things, on others hand some people significantly want to used their old instrument. consequently the government apply strong rules to increased recycling process. for example make this type of rules , when people decline the rules then this time they pay fine for nation that type of rules may many people followed.

in conclusion , i thought that is a good way to increased significantly recycling process legally. furthermore, the government rules reduce waste and make people life really happier . in addition, it can be saved money buy same another things. The recycling process is good to reduce waste and make that again usable in contract, its make air pollution by recycling facttries.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0

The response addresses the prompt by taking a clear position in favor of legal requirements for recycling. However, the development of ideas is limited and often repetitive. While you mention that laws ensure proper waste management and save money, the arguments lack depth and specific, well-explained examples. The final paragraph introduces a contradictory point about pollution from recycling factories, which is not clearly linked to the main argument, making the overall position slightly confusing. To improve, focus on expanding each point with a clear logical progression and ensure that every sentence directly supports your central thesis.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.0

The essay is organized into paragraphs, but the logical flow is frequently interrupted by awkward phrasing and unclear transitions. While you use some cohesive devices like 'in addition' and 'consequently,' they are often used incorrectly or in a way that does not naturally connect the ideas. The referencing is sometimes ambiguous, making it difficult for the reader to follow your train of thought. To achieve a higher score, focus on using transition words more accurately and ensuring that each paragraph has a clear, singular focus that builds upon the previous one.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.0

The vocabulary is quite limited and repetitive, relying on basic words like 'things,' 'good,' and 'rules.' There are several instances of incorrect word choice, such as 'environment is sanitation' and 'fulfil our needed things,' which hinder clarity. You attempt to use some topic-specific vocabulary, but the lack of precision and frequent errors in collocation make the writing feel unnatural. To improve, try to learn and use more precise synonyms for common words and focus on learning the correct collocations for academic topics like environmental policy and waste management.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The essay contains frequent grammatical errors that often impede communication. There are consistent issues with subject-verb agreement (e.g., 'government make a strong rules'), article usage, and sentence structure. Many sentences are fragmented or run-on, and the punctuation is often misused, particularly with the placement of periods and commas. While you attempt some complex structures, they are almost always inaccurate. To improve, focus on mastering basic sentence construction, ensuring that subjects and verbs agree, and practicing the correct use of articles and prepositions before attempting more complex grammatical forms.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.