Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-09-25

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.

To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

People argue that minimal household waste is being recycled and the only way to level up the recycling process is that governments should make it a legal obligation. I believe, though recycling the waste is a social responsibilty of a citizen, but the legal requirement will hold them more responsible which will in turn increase recycling of waste products.

I contend that it is the citizens' responsibilty to recycle the waste. Being a resposible citizen, it should not be the governemt's responsibilty to emphasize the importance of recycling the waste materialHowever, it is our duty to minimize waste and recycle the producs we can. In several states, people do it without the fear of law. For instance, in Germany, Fineland and Norway, people usually prefer to recycle their waste instead of throwing it unthoughtfully. That will not only minize the duty of law enforcement institutions but also maximze the impact. Thus, it is more beneficial if citizens adopt it as their resposibilty.

However, I strongly believe that the impact can be doubled if the governments make recycling as legally mendatory. Some citizens prefer irresposible behaviours in the absence of legitimate consequences. When governments put heavy challans over this negligence, people will be more careful about recycling their wastes. For example, in Gulf countries like Qatar and UAE, officials charge heavy fines if people demonstrate carelessness regarding pollution or unmindful management of the waste. Resultantly, people are forced to follow the law and these countries become less pollutant. Therefore, I stronly believe that this step will maximize the result.

To conclude, I think it is a citezens social responsiblity to recycle the waste of their home, however governments should make it a legal obligation. Ultimately, people will be more conscious abour recycling.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

The response addresses both parts of the task by discussing whether recycling should be a personal responsibility or a legal requirement. You take a clear position throughout the essay, stating initially that laws will hold citizens more accountable and concluding that both personal duty and legal obligations are necessary. Main ideas are supported with relevant examples, such as referencing countries like Germany, Finland, Norway, Qatar, and the UAE to illustrate both voluntary and legally enforced recycling. However, some arguments contain minor over-generalizations and could be extended further with deeper analysis of how laws practically change systemic habits. Overall, the content sufficiently meets the requirements for a Band 6.5 to 7.0 response, demonstrating a clear overarching perspective.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The essay displays a coherent overall arrangement with a clear introduction, body paragraphs exploring opposing views, and a brief conclusion. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate distinct arguments. However, cohesion at the sentence level is occasionally faulty or mechanical. For instance, transitional phrases like 'materialHowever' lack proper spacing and punctuation. Referencing and cohesive devices such as 'Resultantly' and 'Thus' are used, but referencing can sometimes be slightly unclear or repetitive. Paragraph transitions are evident, yet the logical progression between sentences occasionally stumbles due to mechanical formatting issues and mechanical linking.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

The student demonstrates an adequate vocabulary range for the task, attempting less common lexical items such as 'obligation', 'legitimate consequences', and 'pollutant'. However, there are several noticeable spelling and word choice errors throughout the text, including 'responsibilty' (repeated multiple times), 'governemt's', 'Fineland', 'minize', 'maximze', 'mendatory', 'irresposible', 'challans', 'stronly', and 'citezens'. These spelling inaccuracies distract the reader, though they rarely impede overall communication. To reach a higher band, greater precision in spelling and more natural collocations are required.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, demonstrating attempts at conditional and dependent clauses such as 'When governments put heavy challans over this negligence, people will be more careful...' However, there are frequent grammatical errors and awkward phrasings, such as 'I believe, though recycling the waste is a social responsibilty of a citizen, but the legal requirement...' which exhibits double conjunction misuse. Other errors involve preposition choices ('put heavy challans over') and article omissions. Punctuation errors also appear, such as missing spaces before closing sentences. While communication is not severely hindered, the frequency of errors places this firmly in the Band 6 category.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.