Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-09-29

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.

To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The issue of household waste recycling is debateable topic in the recent years. Some individuals claim that not enough of the trash from indoors is recycled. Most of the citizen are in the view that it's a government duty to enforce legal requirement on that critical situation of recycling. In this essay, I will maticulously analyze the statement and will elucidate my perspective in the forthcoming paragraphs.

Analyzing the statement and explaining further, first and formost, comprehensive education compaigns should be enforce to the public so that, they fulfill legal mandates. If authorities give the legal right to the human beings to develop enough combust boxes for recycling, they will enhance the economy rate of a country development. For example, a survey which is conducted from the China that plethora of mankind have created a bio gas plant in their homes and this diligently of recycling waste really plausible. Hence, organizations should provide the subsidies to the poorer and slum areas which could be effective for the progress of a nation and landfill. Thus, numerious germs which created due to mosquitoes that nurishing on the household waste and spreading multiple diseases can be controled by recycling garbage.

Probing ahead, by addressing the issue from various angels, government could create numerous laws and regulation which followed by public and make environmental sustainability powerful. For instance, a research paper which is taken from the Japan that the strict laws of the authority and government 80% humans follow the rules seriously and clean the dumping ground free from trash and fostering legal compliance.

To recapitulate, recycling is a major problem in recent era, so every one should follow the laws of government strictly but, this can only possible when authority raise the different laws which enforce on public and senior citizen to obey them. On the pflip side of the coin, they should pay without obeying them. Being a civilized citizen people should follow the laws and regulation for the growth of a country.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

The essay addresses the prompt by discussing the role of government legislation in household waste recycling, attempting to take a clear position that laws are necessary. However, the development of ideas is often hampered by confusing phrasing, abrupt shifts, and limited supporting explanations. For instance, the mention of 'combust boxes' and bio-gas plants in China lacks clarity and direct relevance to the necessity of laws. While the writer explores the topic from multiple angles, such as public education and strict regulatory enforcement citing Japan, the ideas remain somewhat under-developed and disjointed. Overall, the response meets the basic requirements of addressing all parts of the task, but the quality of argumentation aligns more closely with a Band 5.0.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The essay is divided into paragraphs, but the overall progression of ideas is frequently disrupted by awkward transitions and confusing sentence connections. For example, phrases like 'Probing ahead, by addressing the issue from various angels' and 'To recapitulate, recycling is a major problem in recent era' attempt to structure the text but result in unnatural and mechanical cohesion. Referencing is occasionally unclear, such as 'they should pay without obeying them,' leaving the reader uncertain of the exact intended meaning. Paragraphing is attempted, but internal logical progression within paragraphs is weak. These issues place this performance within the Band 5.0 category.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is limited and often unnatural, containing noticeable word choice and spelling errors that occasionally impede understanding. Examples include 'debateable topic' instead of debatable, 'maticulously' instead of meticulously, 'compaigns' instead of campaigns, and 'plethora of mankind'. The writer attempts some less common vocabulary items such as 'environmental sustainability' and 'legal compliance', but these are offset by frequent collocation and lexical errors like 'combust boxes' and 'economy rate of a country development'. The lexical range is minimally adequate for the task, fitting the Band 5.0 descriptors.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The essay displays a very limited range of grammatical structures, and attempts at complex sentences are frequently faulty. There are persistent errors in subject-verb agreement, articles, and prepositions throughout the text, such as 'Most of the citizen are in the view', 'waste from indoors is recycled', and 'germs which created due to mosquitoes that nurishing'. Furthermore, awkward phrasing like 'this can only possible when authority raise the different laws which enforce on public' demonstrates weak control over sentence construction. Although some simple sentences are communicated successfully, frequent grammatical errors cause difficulty for the reader, matching the Band 5.0 criteria.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.