Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-10-05

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.

To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

It is often argued by some that household wastage is not recycled as much as it should be, and they think that, to improve this quagmire laws are needed. I partially agree with this statement because laws can only improve recycling at community levels. In addtion to laws, governments should also do awareness compagins to improve recycling at personal level.

Laws should be made to improve recycling practices in the society but they have their limitations. They can only work on the community level, because people follow laws only if they are afraid of the consequences, not because they beleive in the cause of it. So, when they will get the chance to break those laws, they would do it. Since, we are discussing the domestic wastage, people would have plenty of chances to avoid the watch of law enforcement agencies. For instance, people may dispose the wastage along with non recyclable trash and do no recycle it really. Hence, such measures should be done that people may do it without compulsion.

In this regard, governments should do excessive awareness compaigns to develop mindset about recycling the trash. It takes a tremendous effort to make people's beleif about something. So, unless such efforts are not done, any law would be useless. When the major part of the population would be aware of the importance of recycling, they would do it even if there is no policing done to impliment the law. For example, if we are only succesful in teach the importance of recycling to our young ones, our next generations are expected to make better strives in this case.

In conclusion, awareness compaigns are as important as the laws to really enhance the overall recycling habit of the society because laws can be implimented to a extent while awareness goes a long way.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

The response addresses all parts of the task by presenting a clear position that laws alone are insufficient and need to be complemented by public awareness campaigns. The ideas are relevant and generally well supported, fulfilling the core requirements of the prompt. However, some ideas are slightly under-developed or rely on broad generalisations, such as the claim that people will always break laws if they think they can avoid detection. To reach a higher band, the arguments could be extended with more specific examples or deeper exploration of how legislation and education might interact in practice.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The essay presents a clear logical organisation and progression throughout. Each paragraph has a distinct central topic, moving smoothly from the introduction to the limitations of laws, the need for awareness campaigns, and a concise conclusion. Cohesive devices are used adequately to guide the reader, employing transition markers like 'In addtion to laws', 'For instance', and 'In conclusion' appropriately, though referencing is occasionally slightly repetitive. Paragraphing is used sufficiently and logically, contributing to the overall coherence of the response.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

The vocabulary used is adequate for the task, demonstrating an attempt to use less common items such as 'quagmire' and 'compulsion'. However, there are noticeable spelling and word choice errors throughout the text, including 'compagins' instead of campaigns, 'beleif' instead of belief, 'impliment' instead of implement, and 'strives' instead of strides. These lexical inaccuracies and minor spelling slips occasionally distract the reader, keeping the lexical range and precision at an intermediate level.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

The writer employs a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, demonstrating some control over multi-clause structures such as conditional and concessive clauses. There are, however, several grammatical and punctuation errors present, including awkward phrasing like 'such measures should be done that people may do it' and prepositions and articles issues like 'at community levels' and 'to a extent'. These errors occur alongside error-free sentences, but they do prevent the writing from achieving a higher level of grammatical precision.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.