Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-10-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.

To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

Some people opine that in order to increase rate the recycling of waste produced from houses, laws should be made. I agree with the view as people will only go out of their way to seperate the recyclable and non-recyclable waste if there is a punishment for not following the law and reward for the continual involvement in good practices. Moreover, awareness campaigns and events should be conducted on the country side.

In today's busy world, people do not have time to do extra work on recyling of their waste. Firstly, every adult is working in a family, if they are not getting pushed to do something about waste, they would probably not do it. The government should make a law, which encourages the seperation of waste into two bins, each for recyclable and non-recyclable waste. Secondly, a system should be implemented where monthly and yearly rewards in the form of incentives or money should be given to those citizens who participated in recycling practices .

Awareness programmes and compaigns should also be conducted in rural and sub-urban areas. The village people should be made aware of the dangers of plastic to the environment. For example, environment day should be celebrated in villages, where the villagers are taught about the advantage of recyling waste from foods. They should be taught the step-by-step procedures of waste management, where waste can be processed into manure thereby reducing their dependence on expensive fertilizers and harmful pesticides.

In conclusion, enforcement of strict laws by governments which punishes poor practices and awards good practices should be adopted. Additionally, rural areas should educated on the importance of recycling practices.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

Your position is clear from the introduction: you agree that legal requirements are needed, and the conclusion restates this view. You address the question with relevant proposals, including separating waste into two bins and using penalties and rewards to encourage participation. The rural-awareness paragraph also adds a useful complementary measure and explains possible benefits such as turning waste into manure. These ideas are generally extended with reasons and an example, so the response fulfils the task well. To strengthen it further, develop the central claim about laws with more specific explanation of how enforcement would work or evidence of its likely effect. The rewards proposal is relevant, but its relationship to the legal requirement could also be made clearer.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs covering enforcement and awareness, and a conclusion. The progression from household behaviour to rural education is logical, and signposts such as “Firstly,” “Secondly,” and “In conclusion” help readers follow the argument. This is coherent, but some linking is mechanical, particularly the repeated sequencing words, and the relationship between the proposed laws and the separate awareness campaigns could be connected more explicitly. Some references are also imprecise: “they” in “if they are not getting pushed” requires the reader to infer who is meant. Use a wider range of natural transitions and clearer references to make the flow smoother and more flexible.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant topic vocabulary, including “recyclable and non-recyclable waste,” “incentives,” “waste management,” and “fertilizers,” which allows you to discuss the issue clearly. However, the range and control are limited by repeated or imprecise expressions such as “recycling practices” and “do something about waste.” Several spelling errors—“seperate,” “recyling,” and “compaigns”—are noticeable, while phrases such as “recycling of waste from foods” and “on the country side” are not natural in this context. Aim for more precise collocations and check spelling carefully. For example, distinguish food waste from recyclable packaging, and use established terms such as “rural communities” and “household recycling.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex forms, including conditional clauses (“if they are not getting pushed…”) and a relative clause (“a system…where monthly and yearly rewards…”). Most sentences communicate the intended meaning, and the argument remains understandable. Some grammatical errors remain, especially with articles, agreement, and sentence construction. For example, “increase rate the recycling” has an incorrect structure, “every adult is working in a family” is not grammatically well formed, and “rural areas should educated” is missing a passive verb form. The conclusion’s “laws…which punishes” also has a subject–verb agreement problem. Review clause structure, passive forms, and agreement, then proofread punctuation and spacing to improve accuracy while retaining your complex sentences.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.